NFL 2014 Season Week 1 Picks

Create an Account or Login to make your own picks!

These are not our most current picks!
Our freshest batch of picks are the NFL 2023 Season Super Bowl Picks.

Jeremy's PicksMatt's PicksJon's PicksSarah's Picks
Packers 16 @ Seahawks 36
Final
Thu, 9/4/14 7:30pm
3 Picks - 21% 11 Picks - 79%
Seahawks
Seahawks
Seahawks
Seahawks
Seahawks
Seahawks
Packers
Packers
Commanders 6 @ Texans 17
Final
Sun, 9/7/14 12:00pm
11 Picks - 69% 5 Picks - 31%
Commanders
Commanders
Commanders
Commanders
Commanders
Commanders
Texans
Texans
Vikings 34 @ Rams 6
Final
Sun, 9/7/14 12:00pm
16 Picks - 100% 0 Picks - 0%
Vikings
Vikings
Vikings
Vikings
Vikings
Vikings
Vikings
Vikings
Raiders 14 @ Jets 19
Final
Sun, 9/7/14 12:00pm
3 Picks - 19% 13 Picks - 81%
Jets
Jets
Jets
Jets
Jets
Jets
Jets
Jets
Titans 26 @ Chiefs 10
Final
Sun, 9/7/14 12:00pm
0 Picks - 0% 16 Picks - 100%
Chiefs
Chiefs
Chiefs
Chiefs
Chiefs
Chiefs
Chiefs
Chiefs
Jaguars 17 @ Eagles 34
Final
Sun, 9/7/14 12:00pm
0 Picks - 0% 16 Picks - 100%
Eagles
Eagles
Eagles
Eagles
Eagles
Eagles
Eagles
Eagles
Saints 34 @ Falcons 37
final overtime
Sun, 9/7/14 12:00pm
13 Picks - 81% 3 Picks - 19%
Saints
Saints
Saints
Saints
Saints
Saints
Saints
Saints
Browns 27 @ Steelers 30
Final
Sun, 9/7/14 12:00pm
1 Pick - 6% 15 Picks - 94%
Steelers
Steelers
Steelers
Steelers
Steelers
Steelers
Steelers
Steelers
Bengals 23 @ Ravens 16
Final
Sun, 9/7/14 12:00pm
8 Picks - 50% 8 Picks - 50%
Ravens
Ravens
Bengals
Bengals
Bengals
Bengals
Bengals
Bengals
Patriots 20 @ Dolphins 33
Final
Sun, 9/7/14 12:00pm
16 Picks - 100% 0 Picks - 0%
Patriots
Patriots
Patriots
Patriots
Patriots
Patriots
Patriots
Patriots
Bills 23 @ Bears 20
final overtime
Sun, 9/7/14 12:00pm
0 Picks - 0% 16 Picks - 100%
Bears
Bears
Bears
Bears
Bears
Bears
Bears
Bears
Panthers 20 @ Buccaneers 14
Final
Sun, 9/7/14 3:25pm
9 Picks - 56% 7 Picks - 44%
Buccaneers
Buccaneers
Buccaneers
Buccaneers
Buccaneers
Buccaneers
Buccaneers
Buccaneers
49ers 28 @ Cowboys 17
Final
Sun, 9/7/14 3:25pm
16 Picks - 100% 0 Picks - 0%
49ers
49ers
49ers
49ers
49ers
49ers
49ers
49ers
Colts 24 @ Broncos 31
Final
Sun, 9/7/14 7:30pm
2 Picks - 13% 14 Picks - 87%
Broncos
Broncos
Broncos
Broncos
Broncos
Broncos
Colts
Colts
Giants 14 @ Lions 35
Final
Mon, 9/8/14 6:10pm
6 Picks - 38% 10 Picks - 62%
Lions
Lions
Giants
Giants
Lions
Lions
Lions
Lions
Chargers 17 @ Cardinals 18
Final
Mon, 9/8/14 9:20pm
3 Picks - 19% 13 Picks - 81%
Chargers
Chargers
Cardinals
Cardinals
Cardinals
Cardinals
Cardinals
Cardinals
Week Record8 - 8
0.500
Worst Place
9 - 7
0.562
10 - 6
0.625
9 - 7
0.562
Season Record8 - 8
0.500
9 - 7
0.562
10 - 6
0.625
9 - 7
0.562
Scotttime Record1342 - 807
0.625
1295 - 854
0.603
1339 - 810
0.623
1359 - 790
0.632
No-Pack-Vike Record3291 - 1921
0.631
3206 - 2006
0.615
3319 - 1893
0.637
3206 - 2006
0.615
Lifetime Record2019 - 1197
0.628
1906 - 1310
0.593
2009 - 1207
0.625
2018 - 1198
0.627
click me!
Other Nut Canner Picks
scott.jpg
Seahawks
Texans
Vikings
Jets
Chiefs
Eagles
Saints
Steelers
Ravens
Patriots
Bears
Buccaneers
49ers
Broncos
Giants
Cardinals

Week:9 - 7
0.562
Season:9 - 7
0.562
Lifetime:1364 - 779
0.636
IMG_0311_edited.JPG
Seahawks
Commanders
Vikings
Jets
Chiefs
Eagles
Saints
Steelers
Ravens
Patriots
Bears
Panthers
49ers
Broncos
Lions
Cardinals

Week:10 - 6
0.625
Season:10 - 6
0.625
Lifetime:344 - 192
0.642
skull full.jpg
Seahawks
Commanders
Vikings
Raiders
Chiefs
Eagles
Saints
Steelers
Ravens
Patriots
Bears
Buccaneers
49ers
Broncos
Lions
Cardinals

Week:8 - 8
0.500
Season:8 - 8
0.500
Lifetime:414 - 264
0.611
FB_IMG_1499398490950.jpg
Seahawks
Commanders
Vikings
Raiders
Chiefs
Eagles
Saints
Steelers
Ravens
Patriots
Bears
Panthers
49ers
Broncos
Lions
Cardinals

Week:9 - 7
0.562
Season:9 - 7
0.562
Lifetime:772 - 489
0.612
question_mark.gif
Seahawks
Commanders
Vikings
Jets
Chiefs
Eagles
Saints
Steelers
Bengals
Patriots
Bears
Buccaneers
49ers
Broncos
Lions
Cardinals

Week:10 - 6
0.625
Season:10 - 6
0.625
Lifetime:789 - 409
0.659
hambone.jpg
Seahawks
Commanders
Vikings
Jets
Chiefs
Eagles
Saints
Steelers
Ravens
Patriots
Bears
Panthers
49ers
Broncos
Lions
Chargers

Week:9 - 7
0.562
Season:9 - 7
0.562
Lifetime:688 - 386
0.641
IMG003.jpg
Seahawks
Texans
Vikings
Jets
Chiefs
Eagles
Falcons
Steelers
Bengals
Patriots
Bears
Panthers
49ers
Colts
Lions
Cardinals

Week:12 - 4
0.750
Season:12 - 4
0.750
Lifetime:603 - 333
0.644
ColorTouch.jpg
Seahawks
Texans
Vikings
Jets
Chiefs
Eagles
Saints
Steelers
Ravens
Patriots
Bears
Panthers
49ers
Broncos
Giants
Cardinals

Week:10 - 6
0.625
Season:10 - 6
0.625
Lifetime:438 - 271
0.618
one-piece 01.jpg
Packers
Commanders
Vikings
Raiders
Chiefs
Eagles
Falcons
Steelers
Bengals
Patriots
Bears
Panthers
49ers
Broncos
Lions
Chargers

Week:9 - 7
0.562
Season:9 - 7
0.562
Lifetime:191 - 156
0.550
2015-08-23 17.06.53.jpg
Packers
Texans
Vikings
Jets
Chiefs
Eagles
Falcons
Steelers
Bengals
Patriots
Bears
Panthers
49ers
Broncos
Giants
Cardinals

Week:11 - 5
0.688
Season:11 - 5
0.688
Lifetime:124 - 73
0.629
IMG_20131124_132302_774.jpg
GB @ SEA - No Pick
Commanders
Vikings
Jets
Chiefs
Eagles
Saints
Browns
Ravens
Patriots
Bears
Panthers
49ers
Broncos
Giants
Cardinals

Week:7 - 8
0.467
Season:7 - 8
0.467
Lifetime:41 - 17
0.707
1441860133743826163568.jpg
GB @ SEA - No Pick
Commanders
Vikings
Jets
Chiefs
Eagles
Saints
Steelers
Bengals
Patriots
Bears
Panthers
49ers
Broncos
Giants
Cardinals

Week:9 - 6
0.600
Season:9 - 6
0.600
Lifetime:9 - 6
0.600
Create an Account or Login to make your own picks!

Packers 16 @ Seahawks 36

jeremy.jpg
Jeremy
I'm willing to bet everyone will have completely forgotten about the way that one game here ended, and no one will make mention of it.
jon.jpg
Jon
Already had a dream this week that Week 1 games started and I hadn't made my picks. Always distressing. Probably too much so, but that's my reality. Or my non-reality, I suppose.
sarah.jpg
Sarah
I don't like all the hoopla that goes with the first game of the season.

Vikings 34 @ Rams 6

jon.jpg
Jon
People like the Rams here, but I'm trying to figure out why. Is it because of Shaun Hill? Zac Stacy? The defense that I can't name anyone on? You know what the Vikings have? Tons of talent. OK, I'm biased, but they do. They have a lot of talent and a really good offensive coordinator. I like the Vikings in this one, and I find it one of the easier calls of the week.
sarah.jpg
Sarah
I know a bunch of people who are going to be at this game, didn't get invited. Seems to be a theme in my life.

Colts 24 @ Broncos 31

jon.jpg
Jon
Count me as one of the people that isn't ready to pencil in the Broncos for another 13-3 season. I mean, it could easily happen, and it certainly wouldn't surprise me, but things like that are hard to recreate. Manning's teams are always good and he's always good, but eventually, it's just not going to happen so easily. But yeah, they probably will be really good, so I'm picking them.
sarah.jpg
Sarah
Going for the upset! Maybe the Broncos can't overcome the awfulness that was the Super Bowl. Man that was a terrible game.

Giants 14 @ Lions 35

jon.jpg
Jon
I'm not as high on the Lions as people seem to be and I'm probably not as low on the Giants. But what do I know? Actually, what I know is that I wouldn't want Matthew Stafford as my QB. He throws all sidearm and reminds me of Scott Mitchell. But I'm picking the Lions because they're at home and I've basically heard at least one Giants player admit that they are still trying to fully learn their new offense.
sarah.jpg
Sarah
I really have no concept of who's good and who's not. What the heck, I'll go with the home team.

Chargers 17 @ Cardinals 18

jon.jpg
Jon
I should probably pick the Chargers but I didn't.
sarah.jpg
Sarah
Bolo this!
jeremy.jpgJeremy - 9475 Posts
08/26/2014 @ 09:04:34 PM
 Quote this comment
Dun dun dun!!!!
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
scott.jpgScott - 6225 Posts
09/03/2014 @ 01:11:21 PM
 Quote this comment
For all the defensive hold and illegal contact penalties called in the preseason (nearly the same number this preseason as all of last year entirely) in response to some rules emphasis referred to by quite a few people as the Seattle Seahawks rules, the Seahawks were called for exactly 0 defensive holding penalties during the preason. But don't worry, the refs plan on toning down their penalty calling for the regular season, so the Seahawks will likely see that number come down quite a bit.

On an unrelated note: I didn't know what Molly was until last night. If I were Wes Welker, I'd probably have chosen the Mint Julep.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Total:

Rated 1 times.
Scott screwed with this at 09/03/2014 1:14:54 pm
fry6beeu9.jpgJeremy - 9475 Posts
09/04/2014 @ 12:01:44 AM
 Quote this comment
Speaking of which:

http://www.seattlemet.com/arts-and-entertainment/seahawks/articles/11-reasons-the-seahawks-are-so-good-2014

He and I exchanged like 5 long emails on it, for like 8 semi out of context words. It's really not even clear what "it's" refers to. We were talking about the lack of penalties in general and how, IMO, people WAY over estimate how often these penalties get called. Refs aren't going to call defensive holding every time, and you're talking about a misiscule uptick in penalties per game in exchange for holding everyone all the time. It's an exploitable system. Oh well, I guess.

Defensive PI is one of those penalties that I bet, if you asked around, people would guess teams get called for once a game on good games 3-4 on bad days, when in fact it's called under one time per game. Less than half a call per game per team.

Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
Jeremy screwed with this 2 times, last at 09/04/2014 12:15:06 am
scott.jpgScott - Ma'am, can you make sure your computer is turned on?
09/04/2014 @ 07:45:45 AM
 Quote this comment
Part of me thinks that if anything they should redefine defensive holding in such a way that it reflects the way it is actually called in a game. The old adage with offensive linemen is that you can hold as long as your hands are within the shoulders, though I don't think that's in the rulebook in so many words. For defensive holding, there is no such wording, and frankly, there doesn't seem to be even the unwritten, "this is acceptable, this isn't" consensus. Sometimes jersey grabbing gets called, sometimes it doesn't. Sometimes it's only called if the grabbing "turns" the receiver. Sometimes simply handchecking a receiver draws a flag. It's almost like calling balls and strikes in that it's different with every ref. Now, frankly, Jeremy is probably right that it is not called nearly as often is people think it is. That being said, there were about 5 or 6 times as many calls per game in the preseason compared to last year. And while they say that the point has been made and that they will likely return to normal, if they don't and the calls jump to like 2 or 3 calls per game per team, that alone can push football one step close to the arena football, "this is getting almost unwatchable" realm. It probably won't get that bad, but it still changes the game.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
fry6beeu9.jpgJeremy - 9475 Posts
09/04/2014 @ 10:38:38 AM
 Quote this comment
Even if they got strict on it, they're not going to call it every time, so there's still an exploitable gulf there. No ref is going to flag a player on back to back to back to back plays. Worse yet, it almost becomes human nature that the ref would establish what would draw a call as a one-off event for another team as the new baseline in this game. After a time only the truly egregious things would draw a call.

How many passes wont get made because your defense is beating up receivers on every play? Is that not worth one or two first downs? We're talking now about a penalty called .68 times a game. Seattle was 2nd with .58. Let's say they nearly double that this year to 1 a game. IMO anyone who thinks 1 defensive holding a game isn't worth hog-tying receivers on every play needs to read "Moneyball."

We've all decided that playing penalty football is the pinnacle of achievement, and obviously in a perfect world it would be, but in reality a team with no defensive holding, PI, etc probably plays soft crappy defense.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
Jeremy messed with this at 09/04/2014 10:39:36 am
jeremy.jpgJeremy - 9475 Posts
09/04/2014 @ 10:44:11 AM
 Quote this comment
You guys want to know a crazy stat from last season? Denver scored 606 points. The number 2 team, Chicago, had 445, a difference of 161. There was a bigger gap from #1 to #2 than there was from #2 to #30.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
Jeremy screwed with this at 09/04/2014 10:44:29 am
scott.jpgScott - Ma'am, can you make sure your computer is turned on?
09/04/2014 @ 01:17:33 PM
 Quote this comment
Sometimes how something is perceived makes the reality irrelevant. What I mean is that you could look at it in the exact opposite manner. So say the calls go from .5 per game to 1.5 per game. That's a difference of 1 call per game (or less if I'm rounding up to 1.5). That could then suggest that feelings of the fans of the offense-happy rules emphasis is so fragile that any just a small nudge in the direction of more rules to penalize defense could make it all people talk about. Look at roughing the passer. It probably doesn't get called as often as people think, but all anyone says now-a-days is that "you can't even touch the QB". It's probably not true in reality, but the perception is that everytime a defender hits a QB (.000001 seconds or more after he releases the football) fans and players cringe and wait for what they think might be a flag coming. The perception of getting a penalty on every QB hit has changed the way players play. The same could become the case with defensive secondary rules.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
scott.jpgScott - 6225 Posts
09/05/2014 @ 09:23:11 AM
 Quote this comment
After careful consideration I have determined that Seattle has, at a minimum, an above average type football team.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
Leave a Comment of your very own
Name:
Comment:
Verify this code
Verify the Code in this box, or sign in, to post a comment.
click me!
There's an emoticon for how you feel!
click me!
My Files
Sign up, or login, to be able to upload files for Nutcan.com users to see.