NFL 2012 Season Super Bowl Picks

Create an Account or Login to make your own picks!

These are not our most current picks!
Our freshest batch of picks are the NFL 2022 Season Week 4 Picks.

Jeremy's PicksMatt's PicksJon's PicksSarah's Picks
49ers 28 @ Falcons 24
Final
Sun, 1/20/13 2:00pm
9 Picks - 82% 2 Picks - 18%
49ers
49ers
49ers
49ers
Falcons
Falcons
49ers
49ers
Ravens 28 @ Patriots 13
Final
Sun, 1/20/13 5:30pm
3 Picks - 23% 10 Picks - 77%
Patriots
Patriots
Patriots
Patriots
Patriots
Patriots
Patriots
Patriots
Week Record1 - 1
0.500
1 - 1
0.500
0 - 2
0.000
Worst Place
1 - 1
0.500
Season Record171 - 94
0.645
166 - 99
0.626
167 - 98
0.630
173 - 92
0.653
Scotttime Record1166 - 700
0.625
1127 - 739
0.604
1161 - 705
0.622
1184 - 682
0.634
No-Pack-Vike Record2991 - 1764
0.629
2922 - 1833
0.615
3027 - 1728
0.637
2942 - 1813
0.619
Lifetime Record1843 - 1090
0.628
1738 - 1195
0.593
1831 - 1102
0.624
1843 - 1090
0.628
click me!
Other Nut Canner Picks
scott.jpg
49ers
Patriots

Week:1 - 1
0.500
Season:175 - 89
0.663
Lifetime:1185 - 675
0.637
newalex.jpg
49ers
Patriots

Week:1 - 1
0.500
Season:166 - 99
0.626
Lifetime:1154 - 710
0.619
images.jpg
49ers
Ravens

Week:2 - 0
1.000
Season:85 - 73
0.538
Lifetime:968 - 654
0.597
Me at sams.jpg
49ers
Patriots

Week:1 - 1
0.500
Season:167 - 90
0.650
Lifetime:440 - 263
0.626
hambone.jpg
49ers
Patriots

Week:1 - 1
0.500
Season:170 - 95
0.641
Lifetime:514 - 285
0.643
077.JPG
49ers
Patriots

Week:1 - 1
0.500
Season:171 - 94
0.645
Lifetime:435 - 261
0.625
IMG003.jpg
Falcons
Ravens

Week:1 - 1
0.500
Season:179 - 86
0.675
Lifetime:432 - 221
0.662
ColorTouch.jpg
SF @ ATL - No Pick
Ravens

Week:1 - 0
1.000
Season:161 - 90
0.641
Lifetime:305 - 180
0.629
krystal.jpg
SF @ ATL - No Pick
Patriots

Week:0 - 1
0.000
Season:170 - 94
0.644
Lifetime:184 - 108
0.630
Create an Account or Login to make your own picks!

49ers 28 @ Falcons 24

sarah.jpg
Sarah
Let's pretend like last weekend never happened.
jon.jpg
Jon
This game isn't @ 49ers. It's @ Falcons.

Really torn on this one. I want to pick the Falcons. They're at home and I think they're better than the common perception of them. The 49ers seem to have the better team though. Better rushing, better defense. But does that matter in football these days? Also, is last week's game really something they can replicate? In fact, yeah, going with Atlanta on this one.

Ravens 28 @ Patriots 13

sarah.jpg
Sarah
Which team do you despise more?
jon.jpg
Jon
These teams have played some close games recently, so I don't think New England is a sure thing by any means. But they do seem to be the better team.
jeremy.jpgJeremy - I believe virtually everything I read.
01/25/2013 @ 02:01:11 PM
 Quote this comment
It's up.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
scott.jpgScott - 6225 Posts
01/25/2013 @ 02:11:56 PM
 Quote this comment
If the 49ers win, I wonder if Jim will shake John's hand so hard that they come to blows right there on the field. If I was coaching or playing against my brother, and he came up to me after the game and give me one of these "I'm so better than you" hand shakes, the real rumble would commence thence-after.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
hoochpage.JPGSarah - So's your face
02/02/2013 @ 06:29:46 PM
 Quote this comment
So.... Cris Carter finally got into the HOF. Let this be a lesson, don't be a jerk and maybe you'll get your just rewards faster. Or whatever.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Total:

Rated 1 times.
sarah.jpgSarah - 4405 Posts
02/02/2013 @ 08:00:06 PM
 Quote this comment
Good day to be a Viking fan, funny how that comes on a Saturday, am I right? emoticon In other news, seeing pictures of Rodgers and Favre together on one stage is slightly mind blowing. Favre has aged!
Rate this comment
Yours:

Total:

Rated 1 times.
jon.jpgJon - 1 bajillion posts
02/02/2013 @ 11:44:27 PM
 Quote this comment
Please tell me this comment was a joke.

Sarah Wrote - Today @ 06:29:46 PM
So.... Cris Carter finally got into the HOF. Let this be a lesson, don't be a jerk and maybe you'll get your just rewards faster. Or whatever.


Is that why Warren Sapp got in so quickly? And Bill Parcells? Their waits combined don't equal the amount of time it took to elect Carter.

BTW, "just rewards" and the NFL HOF have little to do with each other. Even in the context of HOFs.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
Jon perfected this at 02/02/2013 11:44:49 pm
hoochpage.JPGSarah - 4405 Posts
02/03/2013 @ 07:59:02 AM
 Quote this comment
It was tongue in cheek. I still have no idea why it took so long for him to get in and have always commented on the fact.. Puzzling. I do know that when he got in all the reporters seemed to make comments that alluded to the fact that he was not nice to them. But that shouldn't take away from what he did on the field. But take it how you will apparently.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
Sarah messed with this at 02/03/2013 8:01:25 am
scott.jpgScott - 6225 Posts
02/03/2013 @ 09:01:21 AM
 Quote this comment
Maybe it was because he was a jerk who didn't win a Super Bowl. (that's tongue in cheek too, by the way) Apparently, winning a Super Bowl can cover all ills and is a semi-requirement for being "great", or at least that's how the NFL voices make it seem.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
scott.jpgScott - On your mark...get set...Terrible!
02/03/2013 @ 09:07:51 AM
 Quote this comment
In a recent article in the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel, the Packers were one pick away from selecting Ray Lewis in the 1996 draft, and Ron Wolf was convinced that Lewis was going to fall to them. He even told Lewis while Baltimore was on the clock that the Packers were going to pick him because there is no way Baltimore is going to draft a middle linebacker. That really makes you think how the future would have been different for the Packers. They probably win Super Bowl 32 having a linebacker that could have stopped Terrell Davis. And who knows what the next decade would have brought. One can imagine.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
hoochpage.JPGSarah - So's your face
02/03/2013 @ 09:46:21 AM
 Quote this comment
Pass.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
scott.jpgScott - Ma'am, can you make sure your computer is turned on?
02/04/2013 @ 10:45:17 AM
 Quote this comment
I'm curious what everyone thinks about the "non-call" of holding or pass interference on the 4th and goal at the five at the end of the game that could have given the 49ers a first down. The consensi (consensusses?) from all the talking heads both in the booth and analysts everywhere seemed to be the same old tired argument about "letting the players play" or "you can't call that at this point of the game" or "the 49ers can't expect to be bailed out by the refs". To me, this is the exact thing that Jon pointed out in his Worst Ideas article about calling the game differently at the end of the game.

To me it seemed like a fairly obvious holding or pass intereference call. Even the play by play guys broke it down and verbally pointed out that there was definite contact initiated by the defender well beyond the 5 yard window, but then proceeded to justify the non-call simply because of the magnitude of the moment. To me that seems patently unfair to the person whom the action is inhibitting. People were saying that the 49ers can't expect to be "bailed out by the refs", but why is someone committing a penalty and calling the game correct considered being "bailed out?" (The offensive lineman picked up the defender and carried him off the field and the refs threw a flag for holding. Man, the defense really got bailed out by that holding call there, Jim). Like Jeremy likes to say, it's either holding or it's not. The situation in which it occurs should have nothing to do with whether or not a call should be made. I can't fault the defender for doing what he did, because if he doesn't, there is a decent chance that ball is a caught for a touchdown. But how do you justify calling out the 49ers for wanting to get "bailed out" when the defense performed an illegal action that intentionally inhibitted the receiver from carrying out his play. Saying you have to let the players play it out on the field is the worst argument ever when one of those players essentially is cheating. That's why football has rules.

(I don't care necessarily about any other call/non-call at the moment. If there were other calls that evened this one out, fine, but that's not the point. The point is that defending this non-call by saying "let the boys play" or "don't whine when the refs don't bail you out" is the most asinine analysis anyone could think of. The call is either wrong or it's right, not "wrong, but..." If you think the non-call was correct because the contact wasn't that bad or it was two sided or whatever, fine. But "it was correct because this is the Super Bowl" isn't a valid reason.)
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
jon.jpgJon - Nutcan.com's kitten expert
02/04/2013 @ 10:13:32 PM
 Quote this comment
Yeah I think it was holding. I haven't read much beyond headlines about the reaction to it, but yeah the "swallow the whistles" argument is ridiculous.
From the other end though, it sucks that it happened on a play that would tilt the game either way, but 49ers fans and players, etc. don't need to dwell on it as THE reason they lost. It's one reason, but just one of many.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
hoochpage.JPGSarah - So's your face
02/10/2013 @ 09:37:02 AM
 Quote this comment
No football today. Now is the winter of our discontent.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
scott.jpgScott - 6225 Posts
02/12/2013 @ 02:02:21 PM
 Quote this comment
http://espn.go.com/new-york/nfl/story/_/id/8940414/nfl-mulling-super-bowl-xlviii-backup-plans-report

It almost pains me to say it, but Skip and Steven A. seem to have done the impossible. 1) they agreed on something. 2) they formed coherent arguments void of yelling, childishness, insults, and the like. And 3) I actually agree with it.

Basically, they are addressing the topic of a Super Bowl in New York, and both agree that the Super Bowl shouldn't be in a cold whether climate unless it's a domed stadium. They say that the Super Bowl should be as neutral as possible, and that you shouldn't put it in a place where whether could likely be a problem . And they also, in my opinion, make very good arguments about how this is unique to the Super Bowl, and not to playoff games; teams earn the right to play at home in their climate to play to represent their conference in the Super Bowl. The Super Bowl is now a faceoff of the two conferences, and should be as neutral as can be.

I just thought it was worth pointing out that even a blind squirrel can find a nut sometimes.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
fry6beeu9.jpgJeremy - Robots don't say 'ye'
02/14/2013 @ 01:17:14 PM
 Quote this comment
Playing in domes does potentially have a bias in direction of dome teams. As artificial turf has become more and more grasslike you hear about it less and less, but a dome team can build more of a "track team" to an outdoor team's "mudders" (His mudder was a mudder.)
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
Leave a Comment of your very own
Name:
Comment:
Verify this code
Verify the Code in this box, or sign in, to post a comment.
click me!
There's an emoticon for how you feel!
click me!
My Files
Sign up, or login, to be able to upload files for Nutcan.com users to see.