NFL 2009 Season Week 8 Picks
Create an Account or Login to make your own picks!These are not our most current picks!
Our freshest batch of picks are the NFL 2023 Season Super Bowl Picks.
 |  |  |  | |||||
| Dolphins 30 @ Jets 25 Final Sun, 11/1/09 12:00pm
|
Jets
 |
Dolphins
 |
Jets
|
Jets
|
||||
| 49ers 14 @ Colts 18 Final Sun, 11/1/09 12:00pm
|
Colts
 |
Colts
|
Colts
|
Colts
|
||||
| Rams 17 @ Lions 10 Final Sun, 11/1/09 12:00pm
|
Lions
 |
Lions
|
Lions
|
Lions
|
||||
| Vikings 38 @ Packers 26 Final Sun, 11/1/09 12:00pm
|
Vikings
 |
Vikings
|
Vikings
|
Packers
 |
||||
| Seahawks 17 @ Cowboys 38 Final Sun, 11/1/09 12:00pm
|
Cowboys
 |
Cowboys
|
Cowboys
|
Cowboys
|
||||
| Broncos 7 @ Ravens 30 Final Sun, 11/1/09 12:00pm
|
Broncos
 |
Broncos
|
Broncos
|
Ravens
 |
||||
| Texans 31 @ Bills 10 Final Sun, 11/1/09 12:00pm
|
Texans
 |
Texans
|
Texans
|
Bills
 |
||||
| Browns 6 @ Bears 30 Final Sun, 11/1/09 12:00pm
|
Bears
 |
Bears
|
Bears
|
Bears
|
||||
| Raiders 16 @ Chargers 24 Final Sun, 11/1/09 3:05pm
|
Chargers
 |
Chargers
|
Chargers
|
Chargers
|
||||
| Jaguars 13 @ Titans 30 Final Sun, 11/1/09 3:05pm
|
Jaguars
 |
Titans
 |
Jaguars
|
Jaguars
|
||||
| Panthers 34 @ Cardinals 21 Final Sun, 11/1/09 3:15pm
|
Cardinals
 |
Cardinals
|
Cardinals
|
Cardinals
|
||||
| Giants 17 @ Eagles 40 Final Sun, 11/1/09 3:15pm
|
Giants
 |
Giants
|
Giants
|
Giants
|
||||
| Falcons 27 @ Saints 35 Final Mon, 11/2/09 7:30pm
|
Saints
 |
Saints
|
Saints
|
Saints
|
||||
| Week Record | 7 - 6 0.538  | 9 - 4 0.692 | 7 - 6 0.538 | 6 - 7 0.462 | ||||
| Season Record | 79 - 37 0.681 | 74 - 42 0.638 | 76 - 40 0.655 | 81 - 35 0.698 | ||||
| Scotttime Record | 581 - 335 0.634 | 556 - 360 0.607 | 571 - 345 0.623 | 578 - 338 0.631 | ||||
| No-Pack-Vike Record | 3291 - 1921 0.631 | 3206 - 2006 0.615 | 3319 - 1893 0.637 | 3206 - 2006 0.615 | ||||
| Lifetime Record | 1258 - 725 0.634 | 1167 - 816 0.589 | 1241 - 742 0.626 | 1237 - 746 0.624 |
Colts
Lions
Packers
Cowboys
Ravens
Bills
Bears
Chargers
Titans
Cardinals
Giants
Saints
| Week: | 8 - 5 0.615 |
| Season: | 81 - 35 0.698 |
| Lifetime: | 586 - 330 0.640 |
Colts
Lions
Packers
Cowboys
Ravens
Texans
Bears
Chargers
Titans
Cardinals
Eagles
Saints
| Week: | 9 - 4 0.692 |
| Season: | 77 - 39 0.664 |
| Lifetime: | 564 - 351 0.616 |
Colts
Lions
Vikings
Cowboys
Ravens
Texans
Bears
Chargers
Jaguars
Cardinals
Giants
Saints
| Week: | 8 - 5 0.615 |
| Season: | 64 - 38 0.627 |
| Lifetime: | 547 - 350 0.610 |
Colts
Lions
Packers
Cowboys
Ravens
Texans
Bears
Chargers
Titans
Cardinals
Giants
Saints
| Week: | 9 - 4 0.692 |
| Season: | 52 - 33 0.612 |
| Lifetime: | 171 - 133 0.562 |
Colts
Lions
Packers
Cowboys
Broncos
Bills
Bears
Chargers
Jaguars
Cardinals
Giants
Saints
| Week: | 5 - 8 0.385 |
| Season: | 58 - 29 0.667 |
| Lifetime: | 380 - 224 0.629 |
Colts
Rams
Packers
Cowboys
Ravens
Texans
Bears
Chargers
Jaguars
Cardinals
Eagles
Saints
| Week: | 10 - 3 0.769 |
| Season: | 65 - 37 0.637 |
| Lifetime: | 376 - 257 0.594 |
![IMG_3063[1].jpg](/images/thumbnail.php?height=18&file=/uploads/IMG_3063[1].jpg){kind=small}
Colts
Lions
Vikings
Cowboys
Ravens
Texans
Bears
LV @ LAC - No Pick
Titans
Cardinals
Eagles
Saints
| Week: | 9 - 3 0.750 |
| Season: | 59 - 40 0.596 |
| Lifetime: | 349 - 231 0.602 |
Colts
Lions
Packers
Cowboys
Ravens
Texans
Bears
Chargers
Titans
Cardinals
Eagles
Saints
| Week: | 10 - 3 0.769 |
| Season: | 71 - 45 0.612 |
| Lifetime: | 357 - 228 0.610 |
Colts
Lions
Packers
Cowboys
Ravens
Texans
Bears
Chargers
Titans
Cardinals
Giants
Saints
| Week: | 8 - 5 0.615 |
| Season: | 72 - 33 0.686 |
| Lifetime: | 290 - 167 0.635 |
Colts
Lions
Vikings
Cowboys
Ravens
Texans
Bears
Chargers
Jaguars
Cardinals
Giants
Saints
| Week: | 8 - 5 0.615 |
| Season: | 58 - 31 0.652 |
| Lifetime: | 319 - 179 0.641 |
Colts
Lions
Vikings
Cowboys
Ravens
Texans
Bears
Chargers
Titans
Cardinals
Giants
Saints
| Week: | 10 - 3 0.769 |
| Season: | 69 - 47 0.595 |
| Lifetime: | 156 - 118 0.569 |
Colts
Lions
Vikings
Cowboys
Ravens
Texans
Bears
Chargers
Titans
Cardinals
Giants
Falcons
| Week: | 8 - 5 0.615 |
| Season: | 74 - 41 0.643 |
| Lifetime: | 236 - 121 0.661 |
Colts
Lions
Vikings
Cowboys
Ravens
Bills
Bears
Chargers
Jaguars
Cardinals
Giants
Saints
| Week: | 7 - 6 0.538 |
| Season: | 79 - 36 0.687 |
| Lifetime: | 210 - 107 0.662 |
Colts
Lions
Vikings
Cowboys
Broncos
Bills
Bears
Chargers
Titans
Cardinals
Eagles
Saints
| Week: | 8 - 5 0.615 |
| Season: | 76 - 40 0.655 |
| Lifetime: | 76 - 40 0.655 |
Colts
Lions
Packers
Cowboys
Broncos
Texans
Bears
Chargers
Jaguars
Cardinals
Giants
Saints
| Week: | 6 - 7 0.462 |
| Season: | 74 - 42 0.638 |
| Lifetime: | 74 - 42 0.638 |
SF @ IND - No Pick
LA @ DET - No Pick
MIN @ GB - No Pick
SEA @ DAL - No Pick
DEN @ BAL - No Pick
HOU @ BUF - No Pick
CLE @ CHI - No Pick
Chargers
Jaguars
Cardinals
Eagles
Saints
| Week: | 3 - 2 0.600 |
| Season: | 44 - 31 0.587 |
| Lifetime: | 44 - 31 0.587 |
Colts
Lions
Vikings
Cowboys
Ravens
Texans
Bears
Chargers
Jaguars
Cardinals
Giants
Saints
| Week: | 8 - 5 0.615 |
| Season: | 56 - 27 0.675 |
| Lifetime: | 56 - 27 0.675 |
Colts
Lions
Packers
Cowboys
Broncos
Texans
Bears
Chargers
Jaguars
Cardinals
Giants
Saints
| Week: | 6 - 7 0.462 |
| Season: | 34 - 22 0.607 |
| Lifetime: | 34 - 22 0.607 |
Colts
Lions
Vikings
Cowboys
Broncos
Texans
Bears
Chargers
Jaguars
Cardinals
Giants
Saints
| Week: | 8 - 5 0.615 |
| Season: | 19 - 13 0.594 |
| Lifetime: | 19 - 13 0.594 |
Create an Account or Login to make your own picks!
 | Falcons 27 @ Saints 35 | |
 | SarahI'm interested in watching the Lions/Rams game. Like I saw the match up and was instantly intrigued. Woot! |
 | MattThis could be a good game. I'll take the Saints at home. |
 | JonNew Orleans is definitively the "it" team this year, right? I mean, at least in the NFC? Usually that means a loss is imminent, but maybe they'll win anyway. |
  | Scott - On your mark...get set...Terrible! 10/28/2009 @ 10:39:31 AM |
 |
|---|---|---|
|
I take a significant amount of offense to Sarah referring to fans who will cheer Favre as being "dumb". This is how I feel, and I don't think there's anything dumb about it. Sure I want to stick it Favre a little bit, but only sort of a "for old time's sake" kind of way. This whole overlyemotional outpouring is getting old. Anyway, time will heal all wounds, and those that can't welcome him back eventually didn't deserve him to begin with (oh I went there). In other news, the Packers are actually favored in this game. That seems pretty crazy. |
Yours:
 
Total:  Rated 4 times. |
|
![IMG_3063[1].jpg](/images/thumbnail.php?height=30&file=/uploads/IMG_3063[1].jpg){kind=small}  | jthompto 10/28/2009 @ 12:24:16 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| I would hope that most Packer fans are educated enough to know that Favre is not the devil and he doesn't deserve all of the blame for the way things ended in Green Bay. Ok, so he is now playing for your hated rival, but things are ok in Green Bay, you got a pretty good franchise QB there in Rodgers. Like the article says this a chance for the Packer fans to show their class and respect for the greatest player in their franchise history. I know its different but KG got a standing o when he came back to Minnesota for the first time with Boston. |
Yours:
Total: Rated 1 times. |
|
 | Alex - 3619 Posts 10/28/2009 @ 01:05:45 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
jthompto Wrote - Today @ 12:24:16 PM I know its different but KG got a standing o when he came back to Minnesota for the first time with Boston. Understatement of the year. These situations are completely different. |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
 | Jeremy - Robots don't say 'ye' 10/28/2009 @ 01:19:54 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| Possibly, but the sentiments should still be the same. It's like when Brett wanted Randy Moss after his stint in Oakland. It would have indeed been painful to watch one of my favorite players on the Packers, and maybe I would have been conflicted about continuing to root for him, or be a well-wisher, but getting mad at Randy about it would just have been a bizarre, narcissistic, response. The Vikings decided they were done with Randy, and Randy wasn't done with football, so he would have played for whomever wanted him. |
Yours:
Total: Rated 1 times. |
|
 | Alex - 3619 Posts 10/28/2009 @ 03:37:47 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| The Packers don't get mad, they get even. |
Yours:
Total: Rated 1 times. |
|
 | Sarah - So's your face 10/28/2009 @ 05:39:56 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| Why would you cheer a rival QB? He cut his ties, we cut ours. Let's go Packers!!!! |
Yours:
Total: Rated 3 times. |
|
  | RUFiO1984 - 219 Posts 10/29/2009 @ 06:03:40 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
The Rams are on a 17 game losing streak! They might beat the Lions 20 game losing streak this year!!! :) That is, if the Lions win on Sunday :P (Phillies win game 1!!!!!!!) |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
| RUFiO1984 edited this at 10/29/2009 6:10:31 am | ||
|
| Scott - If you aren't enough without it, you'll never be enough with it. 10/29/2009 @ 07:19:50 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Sarah Wrote - Yesterday @ 06:39:56 PM Why would you cheer a rival QB? He cut his ties, we cut ours. Let's go Packers!!!! Since that rival QB meant something to me for most of my sports-watching life, I'll cheer for him initially. And I don't know that it's really all that accurate to say he "cut his ties." He plays for a different team now, but he still will always be a Packer. |
Yours:
Total:  Rated 3 times. |
|
| Scott edited this at 10/29/2009 7:21:06 am | ||
 | Jfk10intex - 229 Posts 10/29/2009 @ 07:33:41 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
| Scott he did cut ties, in the end this is a game sarah and u just kind of have to let things go..... |
Yours:
Total: Rated 5 times. |
|
 | Jfk10intex - 229 Posts 10/29/2009 @ 07:41:32 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
| and btw scott, he wont always be a packer, and if your going to expect that sarah get over this emotional bullcrap about how favre betrayed the packers then you need to get over this he will always be a packer because the fact is... HE DECIDED to retire, HE DECIDED to move to the vikings, out of any other team, HE DECIDED to do this to Green Bay, knowing full well what some of the fans would think. I think its fair to say that He is no longer a packer. end of story |
Yours:
Total: Rated 3 times. |
|
 | RUFiO1984 - Go Lions!!! 10/29/2009 @ 07:58:49 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
| Didn't Green Bay want to move on anyways? so... Get over it?! |
Yours:
Total: Rated 3 times. |
|
 | Carlos44ec - "The tallest blade of grass is the first to be cut by the lawnmower." 10/29/2009 @ 08:16:51 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
jthompto Wrote - Yesterday @ 12:24:16 PM I would hope that most Packer fans are educated enough to know that Favre is not the devil and he doesn't deserve all of the blame for the way things ended in Green Bay. Ok, so he is now playing for your hated rival, but things are ok in Green Bay, you got a pretty good franchise QB there in Rodgers. Like the article says this a chance for the Packer fans to show their class and respect for the greatest player in their franchise history. I know its different but KG got a standing o when he came back to Minnesota for the first time with Boston. So did Torii |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
 | Carlos44ec - 2079 Posts 10/29/2009 @ 08:18:55 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Get over last season, 0-16 boy! Lions are 1-21 between this year and last year. |
Yours:
Total:  Rated 1 times. |
|
| Carlos44ec screwed with this 2 times, last at 10/29/2009 8:21:31 am | ||
|
| Scott - 6225 Posts 10/29/2009 @ 09:50:15 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
| Well, I still have Favre's picture up on my wall, and he's wearing a packer jersey. My Favre 4 Ever DVD shows him in a Packer uniform. My Brett Favre Bobblehead is a Packer, my 1996 Packer Year Book VHS has Brett Favre as the QB. I could go on if you want. |
Yours:
Total: Rated 1 times. |
|
| Scott edited this at 10/29/2009 10:00:27 am | ||
 | Jeremy - As Seen On The Internet 10/29/2009 @ 10:28:04 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Jfk10intex Wrote - Today @ 07:41:32 AM HE DECIDED to do this to Green Bay, knowing full well what some of the fans would think. I think its fair to say that He is no longer a packer. end of story Actually, to be fair, I think he, just like a number of other people, were caught off guard at how willing people were to turn on him and how personal they were going to take it. |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
|
| Scott - If you aren't enough without it, you'll never be enough with it. 10/29/2009 @ 10:58:02 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Favre downplays the importance of return to Lambeau. From the article: That Favre is downplaying his return to Lambeau so thoroughly can only mean one thing: It means everything to him. AND "In my opinion, if you're a true fan, you're a true fan," Favre said. "Maybe this year. . . . Packer fans, as you know, are like no other. If you're a true Packer fan, you want the Packers to win. If you're a Brett Favre fan, then this week obviously you don't want me to win, but for the most part, 'Hey, hope this guy does well but hope the Packers go all the way.' I actually think Favre has a pretty good handle on it. |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
| Scott perfected this at 10/29/2009 11:01:48 am | ||
 | Matt - Nutcan.com's MBL 10/29/2009 @ 11:12:57 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
The return of the.... |
Yours:
Total: Rated 1 times. |
|
|
| RUFiO1984 - 219 Posts 10/30/2009 @ 09:09:01 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Carlos44ec Wrote - Yesterday @ 09:18:55 AM RUFiO1984 Wrote - Yesterday @ 08:58:49 AM Didn't Green Bay want to move on anyways? so... Get over it?! Get over last season, 0-16 boy! Lions are 1-21 between this year and last year. I am over it lol it is easy to get over things like that when you are a Lions fan... But I stay positive :) |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
 | Sarah - 4605 Posts 10/30/2009 @ 01:50:49 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| Too much? http://www.latimes.com/sports/la-sp-sports-media30-2009oct30,0,3394101.story |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
 | Jon - 1000000 posts (and counting!) 10/31/2009 @ 03:56:16 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Just got here for the week. I was thinking earlier what the response of the Packers fans should be. Personally, I think booing a player is almost always lame, even if he's the best player on your least favorite team. All the more so when the player was basically the collective man-crush of the entire state for a decade and a half. But I'm cool with the fans giving him an otherwise icy reception. At least as it relates to the actual game. He's not the Packers quarterback anymore and he is the Vikings quarterback. He was happy to beat the Packers and they should be happy to try and beat him. All the rest of the stuff seems over the top though. I have plenty more thoughts on the fan-athlete relationship, but maybe I'll save it all for another time. |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
|
| Alex - 3619 Posts 10/31/2009 @ 06:32:38 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| Dear Badgers, why didn't you play like that the last 2 games? Seriously, Alex |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
|
| Sarah - 4605 Posts 11/01/2009 @ 03:02:57 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| Oh those Lions.... |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
|
| Alex - 3619 Posts 11/01/2009 @ 04:28:16 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| Dear Packers, even though penalty flags match your uniforms it's not cool to get them thrown because of you. Also, I have this shredder here that I think your playbook would get along great with. Maybe we can setup a blind date? |
Yours:
Total: Rated 2 times. |
|
|
| Scott - Ma'am, can you make sure your computer is turned on? 11/02/2009 @ 09:45:30 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
| Mike McCarthy needs to be held accountable for the stupid penalties. The Packers are a young team without a lot of veteran leaders, and in a case like that the coach needs to be more of a motivational leader as well as his other roles. Having an after-the-play personal foul after you just stopped a high powered offense on third down is flat out unacceptable; and a play like that where a player gets overemotional and headbutts someone is a matter of discipline. Tighten up the ship, McCarthy. The 4 point swing there could have changed the whole complexion of the game later on, especially because at the time, your defense goes from being pumped up to demoralized. |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
| Scott perfected this at 11/02/2009 12:08:28 pm | ||
|
| jthompto - 209 Posts 11/02/2009 @ 04:50:01 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| I agree that was a huge game changing penalty. It actually evened out later when the packers commited another penalty causing the Vikings to go for it instead of kick a field goal and came away with nothing instead of 3. But lets face it the Vikings were clearly the better team yesterday as they were in the first game. The Packers o-line is just awful. The only bright spot in the game for the Packers was Rodgers in the second half, although he still seems to hold onto the ball too long. When he gets out of the pocket he can be be pretty dangerous. |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
|
| Alex - Refactor Mercilessly 11/02/2009 @ 07:27:42 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| I think in the first half especially Rodgers was looking down field too often. If the Packers had some screens plays in their playbook they could have called some to help slow the pass rush, but apparently they don't so Rodgers should have just thrown some check down passes instead. Except Finley was out, Lee is more a mid to deep route guy, Grant doesn't really catch many passes and he's the only RB on the roster (Ahman Green's corpse doesn't count), Jordy is the only "possesion" receiver and he's out, so that leaves a converted LB as the only check down option. Of course he managed to score twice. Maybe there's something to that...they could try using their disgruntled d-line players on the o-line. Can't be any worse! Tampa Bay is 0-7 anyway, maybe both lines could learn something from putting themselves in the other guy's shoes. Don't be surprised if McCarthy screams out "LINE CHANGE!" at some point next week. |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
Leave a Comment of your very own
| Name: | |||
| Comment: | |||
| |||
Sign up, or login, to be able to upload files for Nutcan.com users to see.
Fetching Nutcan Content....
Vikings 38 @ Packers 26
Sarah
So this is it. It'll be interesting to see how Favre is "welcomed" back into Lambeau. Knowing how dumb the fans are that go to Lambeau (I'm sure a few should be excluded) they'll probably cheer him or something horrible like that. The mayor has been asking for ideas on how to welcome him back. One idea was to retire #4 for a quarterback that played in the '80's and only played in a few games. That'd be hilarious. The Packers NEED to win this game, they have no alternative. This is for more than just the division, this is for all the fans who believed in a certain QB that decided to kick his faithful followers in the face. It sux that that doesn't mean anything to players.Matt
While it seems like this game should feel "bigger" that the first one, it doesn't.Jon
Remember back to the first couple weeks where people looked at the Favre experiment and gave it the old, "well, yeah they're winning, but he's not exactly leading them to the victories" analysis? Those comments were lame then for a handful of reasons, and they're even lamer now. In my opinion, Favre was brought in to be the missing piece, which he seemed to be early on (early on being a whole 6 weeks ago). But a funny thing seems to have happened now that the offense has been together for a training camp-length period of time. To me, Favre has continued to supply Minnesota with the missing offensive piece, but he's also taken it far beyond that. He's got the reigns of the offense now, and he's doing a really good job. Sidney Rice's talents are getting utilized better than ever and I feel like the Vikings are as much a passing team now as a running team. As much an offensive team as a defensive one even. Part of that is because our defense seems a little hit-and-miss at the moment, but still.Look, I'm not making Super Bowl plans yet or anything. I'm not even that confident they'll beat Green Bay this week. I just think that the BFE (Brett Favre Experiment) has been a great success, to date, and I'm excited to see what happens from here.
On another note, the coaching staff concerns me.