NFL 2008 Season Week 11 Picks
Create an Account or Login to make your own picks!These are not our most current picks!
Our freshest batch of picks are the NFL 2008 Season Wildcard Weekend Picks.

Packers
Eagles
Buccaneers
Saints
Dolphins
Broncos
Titans
Colts
Giants
Panthers
Cardinals
Rams
Steelers
Redskins
Bills
| Week: | 12 - 3 - 1 0.800 |
| Season: | 107 - 52 - 1 0.673 |
| Lifetime: | 443 - 250 - 1 0.639 |
Packers
Eagles
Buccaneers
Chiefs
Dolphins
Falcons
Titans
Colts
Giants
Panthers
Cardinals
Rams
Steelers
Cowboys
Bills
| Week: | 10 - 5 - 1 0.667 |
| Season: | 100 - 59 - 1 0.629 |
| Lifetime: | 422 - 270 - 1 0.610 |
Packers
Eagles
Buccaneers
Saints
Dolphins
Falcons
Titans
Colts
Giants
Panthers
Seahawks
49ers
Steelers
Cowboys
Bills
| Week: | 11 - 4 - 1 0.733 |
| Season: | 99 - 59 - 1 0.627 |
| Lifetime: | 424 - 264 - 1 0.616 |
Packers
Eagles
Buccaneers
Saints
Dolphins
Falcons
Titans
Colts
Giants
Panthers
Cardinals
49ers
Steelers
Cowboys
Bills
| Week: | 12 - 3 - 1 0.800 |
| Season: | 95 - 64 - 1 0.598 |
| Lifetime: | 263 - 163 - 1 0.617 |
Packers
Eagles
Buccaneers
Chiefs
Dolphins
Falcons
Jaguars
Colts
Ravens
Panthers
Cardinals
49ers
Steelers
Redskins
Browns
| Week: | 9 - 6 - 1 0.600 |
| Season: | 81 - 78 - 1 0.509 |
| Lifetime: | 244 - 182 - 1 0.573 |
Packers
Eagles
Vikings
Saints
Dolphins
Falcons
Titans
Colts
Giants
Panthers
Cardinals
49ers
Steelers
Cowboys
Bills
| Week: | 12 - 3 - 1 0.800 |
| Season: | 93 - 66 - 1 0.585 |
| Lifetime: | 228 - 154 - 1 0.597 |
Bears
Eagles
Buccaneers
Chiefs
Dolphins
Falcons
Titans
Colts
Giants
Panthers
Cardinals
49ers
Steelers
Redskins
Browns
| Week: | 10 - 4 - 1 0.714 |
| Season: | 86 - 59 - 1 0.593 |
| Lifetime: | 250 - 147 - 1 0.630 |
Packers
Eagles
Vikings
Saints
Dolphins
Broncos
Titans
Colts
Ravens
Panthers
Cardinals
49ers
Steelers
Redskins
Bills
| Week: | 11 - 4 - 1 0.733 |
| Season: | 98 - 61 - 1 0.616 |
| Lifetime: | 221 - 143 - 1 0.607 |
Packers
Eagles
Buccaneers
Saints
Dolphins
Falcons
Titans
Colts
Giants
Panthers
Cardinals
Rams
Steelers
Cowboys
Bills
| Week: | 12 - 3 - 1 0.800 |
| Season: | 104 - 54 - 1 0.658 |
| Lifetime: | 247 - 116 - 1 0.680 |
Packers
Eagles
Buccaneers
Saints
Dolphins
Falcons
Jaguars
Colts
Giants
Panthers
Cardinals
49ers
Steelers
Redskins
Bills
| Week: | 10 - 4 - 1 0.714 |
| Season: | 94 - 47 - 1 0.667 |
| Lifetime: | 183 - 107 - 1 0.631 |
Packers
Eagles
Buccaneers
Saints
Dolphins
Falcons
Titans
Colts
Giants
Panthers
Cardinals
49ers
Steelers
Cowboys
Bills
| Week: | 12 - 3 - 1 0.800 |
| Season: | 98 - 60 - 1 0.620 |
| Lifetime: | 200 - 109 - 1 0.647 |
Packers
Eagles
Buccaneers
Saints
Dolphins
Broncos
Titans
Colts
Giants
Panthers
Cardinals
49ers
Steelers
Redskins
Bills
| Week: | 12 - 3 - 1 0.800 |
| Season: | 100 - 58 - 1 0.633 |
| Lifetime: | 184 - 110 - 1 0.626 |
Packers
Eagles
Vikings
Saints
Dolphins
Falcons
Titans
Colts
Giants
Panthers
Cardinals
49ers
Steelers
Redskins
Bills
| Week: | 10 - 4 - 1 0.714 |
| Season: | 59 - 41 - 1 0.590 |
| Lifetime: | 132 - 91 - 1 0.592 |
Bears
Eagles
Buccaneers
Saints
Dolphins
Broncos
Jaguars
Colts
Giants
Panthers
Cardinals
49ers
Steelers
Cowboys
Browns
| Week: | 13 - 2 - 1 0.867 |
| Season: | 107 - 52 - 1 0.673 |
| Lifetime: | 194 - 88 - 1 0.688 |
Packers
Eagles
Buccaneers
Saints
Dolphins
Falcons
Titans
Colts
Giants
Panthers
Cardinals
49ers
Chargers
Cowboys
Bills
| Week: | 12 - 3 - 1 0.800 |
| Season: | 94 - 49 - 1 0.657 |
| Lifetime: | 94 - 49 - 1 0.657 |
Packers
Eagles
Buccaneers
Saints
Dolphins
Broncos
Jaguars
Colts
Giants
Panthers
Seahawks
49ers
Steelers
Cowboys
Bills
| Week: | 12 - 3 - 1 0.800 |
| Season: | 74 - 38 - 1 0.661 |
| Lifetime: | 74 - 38 - 1 0.661 |
Create an Account or Login to make your own picks!
![]() | Bears 3 @ Packers 37 | ![]() |
SarahI really don't think the Packers will win, but just so I don't look stupid when they win on some fluke play, I'll pick them. Remember when the Packers could've drafted Grossman? At this point, we'd probably be better off. | |
JeremyI'll be rooting for the Bears, but in the end who knows which team winning will help the Vikings more. | |
JonIf Orton is really healthy, Green Bay will have trouble stopping Chicago's offense. |
![]() | Vikings 13 @ Buccaneers 19 | ![]() |
SarahThe Vikings played a better game last week than the Packers, but the fact that the Packers should've won that game in the end speaks volume. Is Garcia still the QB for the Bucs? I don't even know. | |
JeremyThe Vikings aren't going to get too far with their "We can score 40, if that's what it takes to keep the game close, but we'll try not to get too far ahead either" mentality. Not every team sucks so bad that they can get 24 points off turnovers or special teams and still lose the game. | |
JonTampa Bay is such an unusual team. I don't get Gruden's thinking on what quarterback plays when. And are they still doing that thing where they throw a million times a game? I feel like that could be a bad thing for Minnesota. Then again, the Vikings have the ability to make some big plays on defense that way. |
![]() | Cowboys 14 @ Redskins 10 | ![]() |
SarahSame comment as last week. | |
JeremyYou'd swear Jesus announced his returning. They better win now. | |
JonI think Dallas will win big. |
![]() | Browns 29 @ Bills 27 | ![]() |
SarahSame comment as last week. | |
MattI forgot to get my comments in for the other games this week, but I guess I still have time to write something for this game. Of course, I don't really have anything to say about this game, so I'll just end with Cleveland 24 - Buffalo 22. | |
JeremyWho was drunk at the MNF game draft this year? | |
JonNeither team has anything going lately. Which is always what you want the nation to see. These teams should just take a "pass" on the Monday night thing and play quietly on Sunday. Could happen right? |
|
| jay6666 - 26 Posts 11/11/2008 @ 11:11:28 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
| Denver over Atlanta 28-20 | ||
|
| Carlos44ec - 1589 Posts 11/11/2008 @ 11:16:25 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
| Oh sure, get cocky after you're excellent week! | ||
|
| jay6666 11/11/2008 @ 11:17:22 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
| No i actually go lucky on 3 or 4 games... But Denver will be my upset pick over Atlanta | ||
|
| jay6666 11/11/2008 @ 11:18:47 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
| Also Jags over Titians 13 - 14 | ||
|
| RUFiO1984 - 137 Posts 11/12/2008 @ 03:23:32 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| Baltimore over New York? | ||
|
| Alex - 2391 Posts 11/12/2008 @ 08:15:57 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| Hold on a just a sec, the Packer's would be better off with Grossman? The only way that's true is if they then wouldn't have had any decent QBs and would've taken Brett back. I'll take Rodgers over Grossman any day. | ||
|
| Carlos44ec - Tater Salad? 11/13/2008 @ 09:22:33 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
| I'm almost two weeks late on this, but man... what a classy exit KGB made, huh? | ||
|
| Carlos44ec - www.digi.com 11/13/2008 @ 09:23:53 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Is it really THAT much of a stretch? |
||
|
| Carlos44ec - 1589 Posts 11/13/2008 @ 09:28:39 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
"Jeremy Save some room for B-Dubs. The Lindgren's and Pehler's are steppin' out!" Drop those apostrophes, mister http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_correct_use_of_the_apostrophe_for_a_sign_that_reads_Future_Home_Of_..._Family's_last_name http://www.englishforums.com/English/ApostropheProperNameEndingVowel/vzxh/post.htm |
||
| Carlos44ec screwed with this at 11/13/2008 9:28:59 am | ||
|
| Scott - You're going to have to call your hardware guy. It's not a software issue. 11/13/2008 @ 10:20:26 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
NFL Reviews calls in Packers-Vikings game. Jeremy may have won this battle, but the war continues. It turns out that Adrien Pederson should have been flagged for 60 yards worth of unsportsmanlike conduct penalties for taking his helmet off on the field; that definitely could have had a big impact on the game (of course, if he gets flagged one time, he probably doesn't do it the next 3 times). So I'll still stand by my claim that the reffing favored the vikings in this game. |
||
|
| Jeremy - 5617 Posts 11/13/2008 @ 10:24:10 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
| I liked this story better when I linked to it 24 hours ago in the proper thread. | ||
|
| Scott - 3190 Posts 11/13/2008 @ 10:30:07 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Jeremy Wrote - Yesterday @ 06:15:35 PM OMG. What's the difference? It's a lesser penalty than grounding with the exact same ramifications in this instance. It might even be the right thing to say since that's WHY they were ruling grounding. So he "correctly" called intentional grounding, when that was not even the call. I did not see this in week 10, because I tend not to check the previous week from about Wednesday on. How do you respond to the allegations about Pederson removing his helmet on the field and showing everyone the giant condom he had on his head, at least 4 time? |
||
| Scott messed with this at 11/13/2008 10:33:20 am | ||
|
| Jeremy - 5617 Posts 11/13/2008 @ 10:39:29 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
http://www.nfl.com/videos?videoId=09000d5d80c6ff31 Well, it's clear what happened with the camera right there in semi-slow motion, but I could see how the refs might have thought his helmet just came off on that last run (or technically, when a teammate knocked him over.) Edit: I originally linked to the wrong video. Moment in question is at about the 4 minute mark. |
||
| Jeremy screwed with this 4 times, last at 11/13/2008 10:48:08 am | ||
|
| Scott - 3190 Posts 11/13/2008 @ 10:49:59 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Just for the record, I was strongly considering picking the Vikings over the Bucs, but the Bucs have found very strange ways to win games this year. They seem to just find ways to win games they have no business winning. It's hard to pick against a team like that. Who knew that the vikings running as actually Adrian Peterson, not Adrien Pederson? |
||
| Scott messed with this at 11/13/2008 10:51:27 am | ||
|
| Jeremy - 5617 Posts 11/13/2008 @ 03:48:04 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/powerranking?season=2007&week=11 http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/powerranking?season=2008&week=11 Jets 31 => 9 Packers 4 => 21 What a difference a year makes. I wonder if there's any explanation for these dramatic changes....... |
||
| Jeremy edited this at 11/13/2008 3:53:29 pm | ||
|
| Matt - 1683 Posts 11/13/2008 @ 04:19:29 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
Waluigi is my go-to emoticon. You can have Baby Mario . |
||
| Matt edited this at 11/13/2008 4:19:41 pm | ||
|
| Scott - 3190 Posts 11/13/2008 @ 04:24:46 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Jeremy Wrote - Today @ 04:48:04 PM http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/powerranking?season=2007&week=11 http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/powerranking?season=2008&week=11 Jets 31 => 9 Packers 4 => 21 What a difference a year makes. I wonder if there's any explanation for these dramatic changes....... ![]() Yeah, the explanation is Brett Favre is still awesome. |
||
|
| Matt - Ombudsman 11/13/2008 @ 04:29:27 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Vikings 27 => 18 G-Fre for MVP!!!!! |
||
|
| Jeremy - 5617 Posts 11/13/2008 @ 04:33:02 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Sorry, it's now a proprietary eponym for any evil comment. |
||
|
| jthompto - 114 Posts 11/13/2008 @ 05:43:24 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| So is this NFL network thing really such a big deal. I have always been able to get it no matter where I lived. Then again, I have lived always lived in big cities. Does anyone not have it out there? | ||
|
| Sarah - So's your face 11/13/2008 @ 05:52:55 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
jthompto Wrote - Today @ 05:43:24 PM So is this NFL network thing really such a big deal. I have always been able to get it no matter where I lived. Then again, I have lived always lived in big cities. Does anyone not have it out there? All of EC that just has cable. |
||
|
| Sarah - So's your face 11/13/2008 @ 05:56:07 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Scott Wrote - Today @ 10:20:26 AM NFL Reviews calls in Packers-Vikings game. Jeremy may have won this battle, but the war continues. It turns out that Adrien Pederson should have been flagged for 60 yards worth of unsportsmanlike conduct penalties for taking his helmet off on the field; that definitely could have had a big impact on the game (of course, if he gets flagged one time, he probably doesn't do it the next 3 times). So I'll still stand by my claim that the reffing favored the vikings in this game. Jeremy Wrote - Today @ 10:24:10 AM I liked this story better when I linked to it 24 hours ago in the proper thread. Scott Wrote - Today @ 10:30:07 AM Jeremy Wrote - Yesterday @ 05:15:35 PM OMG. What's the difference? It's a lesser penalty than grounding with the exact same ramifications in this instance. It might even be the right thing to say since that's WHY they were ruling grounding. So he "correctly" called intentional grounding, when that was not even the call. I did not see this in week 10, because I tend not to check the previous week from about Wednesday on. Why wouldn't you look? The yellow is there to tell you there's new content and this way you don't look dumb posting the exact same thing someone else did. |
||
|
| Alex - Just dance 11/13/2008 @ 08:06:03 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Jeremy Wrote - Today @ 03:48:04 PM http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/powerranking?season=2007&week=11 http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/powerranking?season=2008&week=11 Jets 31 => 9 Packers 4 => 21 What a difference a year makes. I wonder if there's any explanation for these dramatic changes....... ![]() The Jets D is way better this year. And Favre is way better than whoever the Jets were running out there last year. I know a number of teams could say this, but with one different play in each of the last 2 games the Packers could be 6-3, which is the record of the current 4th ranked team. |
||
|
| PackOne - 1361 Posts 11/13/2008 @ 09:02:04 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| The Packers will win the North. | ||
|
| Sarah - How do you use these things? 11/13/2008 @ 11:12:17 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| Who cares about the Packers? Go J-E-T-S! Favre was awesome tonight!!!! | ||




































. 
Jets 34 @ Patriots 31
Sarah
A game I'm looking forward to. The Jets have gotten their stuff together and won't be embarrassed again. Why is Brett a Jet? If someone could let me know, that'd be great.Jeremy
Save some room for B-Dubs. The Lindgren's and Pehler's are steppin' out!Jon
I've seen the NY Jets play a bit this year and they haven't really impressed me. I mean, granted, they've put up huge numbers on offense some days, but I'm not sure they're able to do that against good defenses. Also, their own defense isn't that great.