NFL 2007 Season Week 8 Picks
Create an Account or Login to make your own picks!These are not our most current picks!
Our freshest batch of picks are the NFL 2007 Season Super Bowl Picks.

Rams
Steelers
Lions
Colts
Vikings
Giants
Jets
Jaguars
Chargers
Patriots
49ers
Packers
| Week: | 9 - 4 0.692 |
| Season: | 70 - 46 0.603 |
| Lifetime: | 239 - 144 0.624 |
Browns
Steelers
Bears
Colts
Eagles
Giants
Bills
Buccaneers
Chargers
Patriots
Saints
Packers
| Week: | 11 - 2 0.846 |
| Season: | 79 - 37 0.681 |
| Lifetime: | 229 - 153 0.600 |
Browns
Bengals
Bears
Panthers
Vikings
Giants
Jets
Buccaneers
Chargers
Patriots
Saints
Broncos
| Week: | 6 - 7 0.462 |
| Season: | 71 - 45 0.612 |
| Lifetime: | 228 - 152 0.600 |
Rams
Steelers
Bears
Colts
Vikings
Giants
Bills
Buccaneers
Chargers
Patriots
Saints
Packers
| Week: | 9 - 4 0.692 |
| Season: | 29 - 27 0.518 |
| Lifetime: | 93 - 71 0.567 |
Browns
Steelers
Bears
Colts
Vikings
Giants
Bills
Jaguars
Chargers
Patriots
49ers
Packers
| Week: | 10 - 3 0.769 |
| Season: | 73 - 43 0.629 |
| Lifetime: | 73 - 43 0.629 |
Browns
Steelers
Bears
Colts
Eagles
Giants
Jets
Buccaneers
Chargers
Patriots
Saints
Packers
| Week: | 10 - 3 0.769 |
| Season: | 70 - 46 0.603 |
| Lifetime: | 70 - 46 0.603 |
Rams
Steelers
Bears
Colts
Eagles
Giants
Jets
Buccaneers
Chargers
Patriots
Saints
Broncos
| Week: | 8 - 5 0.615 |
| Season: | 51 - 36 0.586 |
| Lifetime: | 51 - 36 0.586 |
Browns
Steelers
Bears
Colts
Vikings
Giants
Jets
Buccaneers
Chargers
Patriots
Saints
Packers
| Week: | 9 - 4 0.692 |
| Season: | 66 - 37 0.641 |
| Lifetime: | 66 - 37 0.641 |
Browns
Bengals
Lions
Colts
Eagles
Giants
Bills
Jaguars
Chargers
Patriots
Saints
Broncos
| Week: | 11 - 2 0.846 |
| Season: | 39 - 15 0.722 |
| Lifetime: | 39 - 15 0.722 |
Browns
Steelers
Lions
Colts
Vikings
Giants
Bills
Buccaneers
Chargers
Patriots
Saints
Packers
| Week: | 11 - 2 0.846 |
| Season: | 39 - 15 0.722 |
| Lifetime: | 39 - 15 0.722 |
Browns
Steelers
Lions
Colts
Vikings
Giants
Jets
Jaguars
Chargers
Patriots
Saints
Packers
| Week: | 11 - 2 0.846 |
| Season: | 29 - 10 0.744 |
| Lifetime: | 29 - 10 0.744 |
Create an Account or Login to make your own picks!
Packers 19 @ Broncos 13
Matt: As do the Packers.Jeremy: The Broncos, this year aside, have traditionally been a tough team at home. Their 2 home losses this year are San Diego and Jacksonville. This could be a tough one for the Packers. Brett Favre will be able to throw the ball even higher than normal in the less dense air.
Jon: Packers on national tv! I could type out, right now, the exact transcript the announcers will read from come game time. And if you've ever watched the Packers on national tv, you could too.
Sarah: Apparently our game is going to start early if there is a game 5 (yawn) of the world series. GO PACK GO!
|
| Jeremy - 5014 Posts 10/24/2007 @ 10:56:15 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
| Always good to see while we can't count on Viking QB's we can always count on some solid "who sucks" updates from Matt. | ||
|
| Scott - Prince Fielder, the largest vegetarian since Stegosaurus 10/25/2007 @ 12:29:25 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| I hope the Colts and Patriots lose this week, so Favre can beat the Chiefs next week and be the first QB to ever do this. | ||
|
| Jeremy - Broadcast in stunning 1080i 10/25/2007 @ 12:38:44 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| But if the Colts and/or Patriots lose what would the media have to beat to death all week? | ||
|
| Scott - 2820 Posts 10/25/2007 @ 12:50:35 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| They can beat to death yet another potential Brett Favre record, duh. | ||
|
| Jeremy - Corduroy pillows are making headlines 10/25/2007 @ 12:57:50 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Well, that goes without saying. They'll still beat that to death, regardless if he's the first or not. Then expect to see the stat of how many different quarterbacks have started during his streak. I think the number has to be expressed in thousands to save space on the graphic. Seriously, if next week isn't undefeated Indy vs undefeated New England expect to see some tears shed on ESPN during the week. |
||
| Jeremy edited this at 10/25/2007 12:59:04 pm | ||
|
| Alex - From now on, that's how you drive 10/25/2007 @ 01:22:13 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Jeremy Wrote - 10/25/2007 @ 12:57:50 PM Seriously, if next week isn't undefeated Indy vs undefeated New England expect to see some tears shed on ESPN during the week. You think the Colts or Patriots will cry on camera if they lose one regular season game? I doubt it ![]() Honestly I'm getting kind of sick of ESPN. It's reached the point of overkill in many respects. I hardly ever even watch Sportscenter anymore. |
||
|
| Jeremy - Robots don't say 'ye' 10/25/2007 @ 02:09:41 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Alex Wrote - 10/25/2007 @ 01:22:13 PM Jeremy Wrote - 10/25/2007 @ 12:57:50 PM Seriously, if next week isn't undefeated Indy vs undefeated New England expect to see some tears shed on ESPN during the week. You think the Colts or Patriots will cry on camera if they lose one regular season game? I doubt it ![]() Honestly I'm getting kind of sick of ESPN. It's reached the point of overkill in many respects. I hardly ever even watch Sportscenter anymore. The Colts and Patriots probably don't care, in the big picture, about going undefeated in the regular season. I meant all the NFL Live/Sportscenter people who have been working overtime prepping the Overhype Machine to discuss which of the undefeated teams will lose would be the ones weeping softly off camera. |
||
|
| Carlos44ec - Tater Salad? 10/25/2007 @ 03:26:45 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| is the overhype machine akin to the wayback machine? | ||
|
| Jeremy - Interslice District Manager 10/25/2007 @ 04:04:29 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Not at all, though both seem to be run by children with ADD and house pets. Also did you mean the WABAC machine or the Wayback machine |
||
|
| Alex - I will possess your heart 10/25/2007 @ 05:26:32 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Jeremy Wrote - 10/25/2007 @ 02:09:41 PM Alex Wrote - 10/25/2007 @ 01:22:13 PM The Colts and Patriots probably don't care, in the big picture, about going undefeated in the regular season. I meant all the NFL Live/Sportscenter people who have been working overtime prepping the Overhype Machine to discuss which of the undefeated teams will lose would be the ones weeping softly off camera.Jeremy Wrote - 10/25/2007 @ 12:57:50 PM You think the Colts or Patriots will cry on camera if they lose one regular season game? I doubt it Seriously, if next week isn't undefeated Indy vs undefeated New England expect to see some tears shed on ESPN during the week. Honestly I'm getting kind of sick of ESPN. It's reached the point of overkill in many respects. I hardly ever even watch Sportscenter anymore.I thought the wink emoticon would make it clear that I was being facetious (which I almost spelled correctly on the first try, one letter off). I also thought the bonus comments about the Overhype Machine (i.e. ESPN) would really make it clear. Clearly, I was wrong. |
||
|
| Jeremy - 5014 Posts 10/25/2007 @ 05:34:38 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| Well it could have been clearer, even if you know what I meant. | ||
|
| jthompto - 65 Posts 10/26/2007 @ 02:33:42 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Is that colts vs pats game going to be on NBC sunday night? it better be.. Do you think the Vikings can just forget about this whole quarterback position and just snap the ball to Adrian Peterson every play? If I have to chose, I will take Holcumb over Jackson anyday, remember Holcumb was with the Eagles in the preseason. |
||
|
| Carlos44ec - 1204 Posts 10/26/2007 @ 02:48:36 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Jeremy Wrote - 10/25/2007 @ 04:04:29 PM Not at all, though both seem to be run by children with ADD and house pets. Also did you mean the WABAC machine or the Wayback machine WABAC. Mr. Peabody and his pet boy. |
||
|
| Scott - You're going to have to call your hardware guy. It's not a software issue. 10/27/2007 @ 03:12:54 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| So, that ongoing debate we had about "luck" and the comment I made about luck ksimply being "preparation meets opportunity". Check this out, in this week's Packer Plus (can't post a link for it because it's a paper that isn't on the internet), there is an article about exactly what I was talking about. The title of the article is "Packer preparation meets opportunity". The opening of the article is as follows: "Thing are going the Packers' way this year wheras they didn't last year. Some people might say, 'They're lucky.' In my opinion, luck is when preparation meets opportunity." Now I'm not going to say that this backs up my point any (because, frankly, we've beaten the "luck" argument to death), but I thought it was pretty cool that I read an article that was saying almost word for word exactly what I had said several weeks ago on the same topic. | ||
|
| Alex - 2058 Posts 10/27/2007 @ 04:41:06 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Scott Wrote - 10/27/2007 @ 03:12:54 PM So, that ongoing debate we had about "luck" and the comment I made about luck ksimply being "preparation meets opportunity". Check this out, in this week's Packer Plus (can't post a link for it because it's a paper that isn't on the internet), there is an article about exactly what I was talking about. The title of the article is "Packer preparation meets opportunity". The opening of the article is as follows: "Thing are going the Packers' way this year wheras they didn't last year. Some people might say, 'They're lucky.' In my opinion, luck is when preparation meets opportunity." Now I'm not going to say that this backs up my point any (because, frankly, we've beaten the "luck" argument to death), but I thought it was pretty cool that I read an article that was saying almost word for word exactly what I had said several weeks ago on the same topic. Maybe you can sue for plagerism. |
||
|
| Jon - 1321 Posts 10/27/2007 @ 11:38:18 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| You know how New England is going at a record setting pace and they could beat the Vikings' scoring record? Well, they usually mention that Moss was on that Vikings team and now is on the Patriots, but I was thinking about another interesting quirk. The Vikings' one loss that regular season? Buccaneers. The coach? Tony Dungy. I just thought I'd mention that before we hear it 800 times. | ||
|
| Sarah 10/28/2007 @ 01:12:23 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| Carolina's looking pretty good against the Colts. So, maybe Peyton won't get that record today, and maybe they won't be able to hype the game for next week against the "unbeatens". | ||
|
| Sarah - 1814 Posts 10/28/2007 @ 02:16:50 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| I think I might have to retract my previous statement. | ||
|
| Carlos44ec - Since 1980! 10/28/2007 @ 05:23:02 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
The Patriots are whooping the Redskins? Kind of reminds you of how we started this country, doesn't it?! edited for more better PC compliance |
||
| Carlos44ec messed with this at 10/29/2007 8:48:57 am | ||
|
| Sarah 10/28/2007 @ 05:24:51 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| InAppropriate | ||
|
| RUFiO1984 - 110 Posts 10/28/2007 @ 07:21:23 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| how about dem lions boooyaaa!~~~~!!!! Catching up to those packers! | ||
|
| PackOne - It's a sin that somehow, light is changing to shadow. 10/28/2007 @ 10:50:03 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Carlos44ec Wrote - 10/28/2007 @ 05:23:02 PM The Patriots are raping the Redskins? Kind of reminds you of how we started this country, doesn't it?! Raping should never be used as a verb. |
||
| PackOne messed with this at 10/29/2007 10:13:06 am | ||
|
| Scott - If you aren't enough without it, you'll never be enough with it. 10/29/2007 @ 07:50:10 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
| I have a growing dislike for the New England area. The Patriots and the Red Sox are on my "Teams I hate" list, which includes pretty much just the Patriots and the Red Sox. For the record, I do not hate nor dislike the Colts, so my distain for the Patriots is not so much related to them being unbeaten. I just don't like them. | ||
|
| Carlos44ec - 1204 Posts 10/29/2007 @ 08:48:17 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Alright, the term Raping was a bit harsh, a tad strong, and a whole-lotta inconsiderate. I will withdraw it immediately for some more PC terminology. Wow, the Nutcan community sure pulled a "white man" on me just now, didn't it! |
||
|
| Carlos44ec - 1204 Posts 10/29/2007 @ 08:52:17 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Scott Wrote - 10/29/2007 @ 07:50:10 AM I have a growing dislike for the New England area. The Patriots and the Red Sox are on my "Teams I hate" list, which includes pretty much just the Patriots and the Red Sox. For the record, I do not hate nor dislike the Colts, so my distain for the Patriots is not so much related to them being unbeaten. I just don't like them. Since Boston/ New England seem to rely on buying Midwest talent, I wouldn't be surprised of everyone out here hated those two teams, plus the Celtics. |
||
|
| Scott - 2820 Posts 10/29/2007 @ 08:58:46 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
| I wish no ill towards the Celtics (not yet, anyway), especially now that they have Ray Allen on their team. Also, I care about as much about basketball as I do MLS (maybe a little more, but I'm not a huge NBA fan). | ||
|
| Carlos44ec - 1204 Posts 10/29/2007 @ 09:02:41 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
| See, now you bring Soccer into the mix. I don't know much about that, but I am trying to pull something together to go see the Thunder play the Galaxy on Nov 11. (You know, the MN team playing Beckham's team?!?) | ||
| Carlos44ec edited this at 10/29/2007 1:12:53 pm | ||
|
| Alex - 2058 Posts 10/29/2007 @ 01:19:14 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Between the Yankees and Red Sox I think I'll plan on disliking the team that most recently won the World Series more. Of course, the Cubs are always #1 on that list despite their lack of actually ever winning anything :) I've been fairly anti-Patriots this decade. I'm not really sure why that started, but it's continued since I'm all about the no-huddle/audible offense on Madden and therefore feel forever linked to Peyton. That being said, I'm not sure I can resist them anymore. The other thing I've spent effort on in Madden is simulating and building a team in the salary-cap era. No one does this better than the Patriots. They ditch respected veterans when their pay outweighs their play. They have the franchise QB, keep bringing in fresh RBs, last year maybe was a mistake at WR though maybe it was just one step back to take two forward, and they pick up pieces to fill a roll in free agency instead of just going after names (see "Washington Redskins"). Besides that they don't pander to the media and they play to win for 60 minutes and don't care if they hurt your feelings. A lot about sports has become too much about entertainment in my mind. These guys just want to win. And even if I don't necessarily root for them, I have to respect that a lot. The Celtics have been pretty bad for awhile and unless it's a rivalry thing I'm not going to kick a team that's been down. I'm fairly neutral on Ray but I like Garnett and the Bucks aren't doing anything this year anyway, so I'll probably be rooting for the C's in most of their games. |
||
|
| Jeremy - Site Admin 10/29/2007 @ 10:38:26 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
So do you guys have to negotiate a cash deal with the refs before every game, or is it some sort of auto debit system? The phrase "opportunity meets preparation" dies tonight. |
||
| Jeremy edited this at 10/29/2007 10:39:22 pm | ||
|
| Sarah 10/29/2007 @ 10:40:08 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
I need to watch a Packer game with Packer fans. |
||
|
| Carlos44ec - What the F@#$ am I being arrested fo? 10/29/2007 @ 10:41:26 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| Well, theys should be pretty slim pickins over there... right? | ||
|
| Jeremy - 5014 Posts 10/29/2007 @ 10:50:35 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Well the Broncos in essence had the ball on the 2 yard line 3 times and got 3 points thanks to stripping the ball from their own team, an absolute phantom holding call that took back a 50 yard run to the 2, and a bone headed bungling of the two minute drill involving an inexplicable settling for 3 points. You'll pardon me if it's a little frustratin | ||


































Honestly I'm getting kind of sick of ESPN. It's reached the point of overkill in many respects. I hardly ever even watch Sportscenter anymore.
Eagles 23 @ Vikings 16
Matt: T-Jack sucks.Jeremy: Childress will want to win against his old team. Perhaps he's just been holding Adrian Peterson back for this game. Before the season started I would have said this was a sure loss, now I'm not so sure. Turns out the Eagles are struggling and the Vikings are one or two big plays from winning every week. If the Vikings could even rely on slightly below average quarterbacking they could be half decent. That being said, the season is done. I don't want to see Kelly Holcomb in there in a vein attempt to win a couple more games than the lesser experienced Jackson would get. I would rather just lose and have a better understanding of what we have, or not, in Jackson. As for this game, Childress should know exactly how to rattle McNabb, whom, if I understand the story correctly, Childress found wandering the streets as a toddler and raised him as his QB of the future.
Jon: KHol has another opportunity to show something. Minnesota should get 85 sacks like the Giants did.
Sarah: I think that the reason why the Cowboys/Vikings was so close was because the Cowboys are not so good, not because the Vikings are not so bad.