NFL 2007 Season Week 6 Picks
Create an Account or Login to make your own picks!These are not our most current picks!
Our freshest batch of picks are the NFL 2007 Season Super Bowl Picks.
 |  |  |  | |||||
| Dolphins 31 @ Browns 41 Final Sun, 10/14/07 12:00pm CBS
|
Browns
 |
Browns
|
Browns
|
Browns
|
||||
| Vikings 34 @ Bears 31 Final Sun, 10/14/07 12:00pm FOX
|
Vikings
 |
Vikings
|
Vikings
|
Bears
 |
||||
| Redskins 14 @ Packers 17 Final Sun, 10/14/07 12:00pm FOX
|
Redskins
 |
Redskins
|
Redskins
|
Packers
 |
||||
| Eagles 16 @ Jets 9 Final Sun, 10/14/07 12:00pm FOX
|
Eagles
 |
Jets
 |
Eagles
|
Eagles
|
||||
| Rams 3 @ Ravens 22 Final Sun, 10/14/07 12:00pm FOX
|
Ravens
 |
Ravens
|
Ravens
|
Ravens
|
||||
| Titans 10 @ Buccaneers 13 Final Sun, 10/14/07 12:00pm CBS
|
Titans
 |
Titans
|
Buccaneers
 |
Titans
|
||||
| Texans 17 @ Jaguars 37 Final Sun, 10/14/07 12:00pm CBS
|
Jaguars
 |
Texans
 |
Jaguars
|
Jaguars
|
||||
| Bengals 20 @ Chiefs 27 Final Sun, 10/14/07 12:00pm CBS
|
Bengals
 |
Bengals
|
Bengals
|
Bengals
|
||||
| Panthers 25 @ Cardinals 10 Final Sun, 10/14/07 3:05pm FOX
|
Cardinals
 |
Cardinals
|
Cardinals
|
Cardinals
|
||||
| Raiders 14 @ Chargers 28 Final Sun, 10/14/07 3:15pm CBS
|
Chargers
 |
Chargers
|
Chargers
|
Chargers
|
||||
| Patriots 48 @ Cowboys 27 Final Sun, 10/14/07 3:15pm CBS
|
Patriots
 |
Patriots
|
Patriots
|
Patriots
|
||||
| Saints 28 @ Seahawks 17 Final Sun, 10/14/07 7:15pm NBC
|
Seahawks
 |
Saints
 |
Saints
|
Seahawks
|
||||
| Giants 31 @ Falcons 10 Final Mon, 10/15/07 7:30pm ESPN
|
Giants
 |
Giants
|
Giants
|
Giants
|
||||
| Week Record | 8 - 5 0.615  | 7 - 6 0.538 | 10 - 3 0.769  | 8 - 5 0.615 | ||||
| Season Record | 52 - 37 0.584 | 52 - 37 0.584 | 54 - 35 0.607 | 57 - 32 0.640 | ||||
| Lifetime Record | 894 - 529 - 1 0.628 | 815 - 608 - 1 0.572 | 874 - 549 - 1 0.614 | 868 - 555 - 1 0.610 |
Bears
Packers
Jets
Ravens
Buccaneers
Jaguars
Bengals
Panthers
Chargers
Patriots
Seahawks
Giants
| Week: | 9 - 4 0.692 |
| Season: | 52 - 37 0.584 |
| Lifetime: | 221 - 135 0.621 |
Bears
Packers
Eagles
Ravens
Titans
Jaguars
Bengals
Cardinals
Chargers
Patriots
Seahawks
Giants
| Week: | 8 - 5 0.615 |
| Season: | 59 - 30 0.663 |
| Lifetime: | 209 - 146 0.589 |
Bears
Packers
Jets
Ravens
Buccaneers
Jaguars
Chiefs
Panthers
Chargers
Cowboys
Seahawks
Giants
| Week: | 9 - 4 0.692 |
| Season: | 53 - 36 0.596 |
| Lifetime: | 210 - 143 0.595 |
Bears
Redskins
Eagles
Ravens
Titans
Jaguars
Bengals
Cardinals
Chargers
Patriots
Seahawks
Giants
| Week: | 7 - 6 0.538 |
| Season: | 20 - 23 0.465 |
| Lifetime: | 84 - 67 0.556 |
Bears
Packers
Eagles
Ravens
Buccaneers
Texans
Bengals
Cardinals
Chargers
Patriots
Seahawks
Giants
| Week: | 8 - 5 0.615 |
| Season: | 55 - 34 0.618 |
| Lifetime: | 55 - 34 0.618 |
Bears
Packers
Eagles
Rams
Titans
Jaguars
Bengals
Cardinals
Chargers
Patriots
Saints
Giants
| Week: | 8 - 5 0.615 |
| Season: | 54 - 35 0.607 |
| Lifetime: | 54 - 35 0.607 |
Bears
Packers
Eagles
Ravens
Buccaneers
Jaguars
Bengals
Cardinals
Raiders
Patriots
Seahawks
Giants
| Week: | 8 - 5 0.615 |
| Season: | 48 - 28 0.632 |
| Lifetime: | 48 - 28 0.632 |
Bears
Redskins
Eagles
Rams
Titans
Jaguars
Bengals
Cardinals
Chargers
Patriots
Seahawks
Giants
| Week: | 6 - 7 0.462 |
| Season: | 17 - 10 0.630 |
| Lifetime: | 17 - 10 0.630 |
Bears
Redskins
Eagles
Ravens
Buccaneers
Texans
Chiefs
Cardinals
Chargers
Cowboys
Seahawks
Giants
| Week: | 7 - 6 0.538 |
| Season: | 19 - 8 0.704 |
| Lifetime: | 19 - 8 0.704 |
Bears
Packers
Eagles
Ravens
Titans
Jaguars
Bengals
Cardinals
Chargers
Patriots
Saints
Giants
| Week: | 9 - 4 0.692 |
| Season: | 9 - 4 0.692 |
| Lifetime: | 9 - 4 0.692 |
Vikings
Packers
Jets
Rams
Buccaneers
Texans
Bengals
Cardinals
Chargers
Patriots
Saints
Giants
| Week: | 8 - 5 0.615 |
| Season: | 8 - 5 0.615 |
| Lifetime: | 8 - 5 0.615 |
Create an Account or Login to make your own picks!
Redskins 14 @ Packers 17
Jeremy: The Redskins looked pretty good against the Lions last week. Look for the Pack to drop two in a row at home.Matt: I miss the Steve Spurrier Era.
Sarah: I watched part of the Redskins game last week. They didn't look that impressive, but they got it done. I hope the Packers can rebound after the dreadful performance from last week. What lack of a rushing game was everyone worried about?
Jon: Smothering defense.
Saints 28 @ Seahawks 17
Jeremy: Looking to try and recapture the magic of last season the Saints have announced they will be playing the rest of the season in 2006 throwback uniforms.Matt: I think this is the Saints' week, but I could be wrong.
Sarah: Sux to the sux
Jon: I just don't think New Orleans will go 0-5.
Giants 31 @ Falcons 10
Jeremy: How badly to you think the NFL wants to swap this game out for the Pats @ Cowboys game?Matt: I thought that I should point out that both of these teams have beaten the Vikings in NFC Championship games.
Sarah: Vick sure is in a lot of trouble. How come the Cowboys vs Patriots game isn't the national one this week? I mean do we really need another Giants national game? Not that we need another Cowboys/Patriots national game, but still. I'd like to see the Patriots get their asses kicked. And I hate the Cowboys.
Jon: I wouldn't be surprised if the Falcons won, but why would I pick them? I'm just glad I can see the Giants on tv again.
 | RUFiO1984 - Go Lions!!! 10/09/2007 @ 10:21:37 PM |
 |
|---|---|---|
|
upset pick of my week 6 rams over ravens!!!! Rest up Detroit, you need it :( ! |
Yours:
 
Rated 0 times. |
|
|
| RUFiO1984 - I put my socks on the wrong feet. 10/09/2007 @ 10:23:28 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| even better upset cowboys over pats!!! but not going to happen :) |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
 | Sarah - 1814 Posts 10/10/2007 @ 06:16:40 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
Happy Birthday Brett! |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
 | tbrown81 10/10/2007 @ 08:47:48 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| Raiders will upset the chargers!!! |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
 | Jeremy - 1.21 Gigawatts!?!? 10/12/2007 @ 11:26:28 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
| Would that really be that big of an upset at this point? |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
|
| Jeremy - 5014 Posts 10/14/2007 @ 12:52:17 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
| Is Micah not picking anymore? |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
|
| Alex - 2058 Posts 10/14/2007 @ 02:11:12 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| The last 2 weeks holding has been called on like ever other offensive play for the Packers. |
Yours:
Total:  Rated 1 times. |
|
|
| Sarah 10/14/2007 @ 02:43:15 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| On the veterans no less |
Yours:
Total:   Rated 2 times. |
|
|
| Sarah 10/14/2007 @ 02:43:35 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| Portis just fumbled 1st and goal for the pack!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
Yours:
Total: Rated 1 times. |
|
|
| Sarah - 1814 Posts 10/14/2007 @ 02:45:17 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| WTF?????????? THat was a push out!!!!!! |
Yours:
Total: Rated 1 times. |
|
|
| Sarah - 1814 Posts 10/14/2007 @ 02:49:15 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| unbelievable |
Yours:
Total: Rated 1 times. |
|
|
| Jeremy - Super Chocolate Bear 10/14/2007 @ 03:43:34 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| You can't drop back to pass 60 times a game and not expect holding penalties. |
Yours:
Total: Rated 2 times. |
|
|
| Scott - If you aren't enough without it, you'll never be enough with it. 10/14/2007 @ 04:14:42 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Flawless logic. I'll expect holding calls when I see holding calls. When there is no holding (as was the case on that bogus call that took away touchdown), I expect there to be no holding call. The Packers won, so I 'm not that upset (although the refs cost me 12+ fantasy points for taking 2 touchdowns away from the packers). Anyway, the "smothering defense" by the Redskins should have given up close to 31 points. I'm feeling pretty good about how this season is going. Especially because the Packers won a game where there played kinda crappy against a pretty good team. Crazy finish to the Vikings-Bears game. Devin Hester should be considered for MVP, because he definitely changes the way teams approach the kicking game. Edit: (I was quoting Jon's "smothering defense" comment, and to be fair, he never specified which team he was talking about.) |
Yours:
Total: Rated 2 times. |
|
| Scott edited this at 10/14/2007 4:15:47 pm | ||
|
| Alex - From now on, that's how you drive 10/14/2007 @ 04:16:45 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| Fair enough, but they called at least 1 real iffy one today. As much as holding supposedly occurs (whether it's called or not) I think it should only be a 5 yard penalty. |
Yours:
Total: Rated 2 times. |
|
|
| Scott - Prince Fielder, the largest vegetarian since Stegosaurus 10/14/2007 @ 04:25:11 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| That holding call that took away the 30 yard touchdown qualifies as a joke of a call, just for the record. |
Yours:
Total: Rated 2 times. |
|
| Scott perfected this at 10/14/2007 4:25:41 pm | ||
|
| Jeremy - 5014 Posts 10/14/2007 @ 04:31:55 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Scott Wrote - 10/14/2007 @ 04:14:42 PM Flawless logic. I'll expect holding calls when I see holding calls. When there is no holding (as was the case on that bogus call that took away touchdown), I expect there to be no holding call. The Packers won, so I 'm not that upset (although the refs cost me 12+ fantasy points for taking 2 touchdowns away from the packers). Anyway, the "smothering defense" by the Redskins should have given up close to 31 points. I'm feeling pretty good about how this season is going. Especially because the Packers won a game where there played kinda crappy against a pretty good team. Crazy finish to the Vikings-Bears game. Devin Hester should be considered for MVP, because he definitely changes the way teams approach the kicking game. Edit: (I was quoting Jon's "smothering defense" comment, and to be fair, he never specified which team he was talking about.) There's holding on virtually every play, so yes expect them to come when you throw enough times. The Packers passed 50 times on the Vikings with 0 holding calls, so I'm not sure what you're all complaining about with the last few games. The holding penalties will come. 50+ passes a game + Favre getting sacked so few times == a pretty good chance there's holding once in a while. Also, keep in mind that sometimes the ref calls a number, they show that player doing nothing wrong in the replay, and all it was was that the ref said the wrong number. They say the wrong number like 10% of the time. They also called back a few huge plays by the Redskins. One for sure I saw was on a play where the wideout was being mugged and held, the Redskin receiver simply used his arms to get a holding/already-falling Packer off of him, and caught a pass for a decent amount of yards. They called penalties on them both and the offsetting penalties was essentially a 20 yard penalty on the Redskins. You guys won a game you had absolutely no business winning. They were kicking your asses all day and if it wasn't for a couple instances of "opportunity meeting preparation" down the stretch you would have lost. Quit your bitching and enjoy the win. |
Yours:
Total: Rated 4 times. |
|
| Jeremy edited this 2 times, last at 10/14/2007 4:39:07 pm | ||
|
| Scott - 2820 Posts 10/14/2007 @ 08:25:26 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
I had a really good rebuke to that comment, but my browser crashed and I lost everything. Basically it boiled down to the mem wanting to point out that the Packers get their fair share of bogus or lame calls despite some people (who may or may not be members of this site) thinking that the Packers are always the beneficiary of some NFL consipiracy. And I really could care less because the Packers did win and are running away with the NFC North. edit: And I saw the same pass interference call that Jeremy described and it wasn't the onesided call has he described it. When a wide receiver fights off a db and the db ends up on the ground, my gut feeling is that maybe that WR did something merriting a flag. But for the Packers it's a gift call. |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
| Scott perfected this 2 times, last at 10/18/2007 8:39:50 am | ||
|
| Scott - Resident Tech Support 10/14/2007 @ 08:28:00 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| Also, is someone going through and giving the 0 nut to every comment? The last 10 comments all were recently given the 0 nut rating. |
Yours:
Total: Rated 2 times. |
|
|
| Scott - If you aren't enough without it, you'll never be enough with it. 10/14/2007 @ 08:43:47 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| I thought of something else about my rant about the officials. This is why it is rediculous to say things like "well, my team is really 2 plays away from being 5-0 instead of 3-2". Case in point, I argue that the Packers were 2 calls away from todays game being a Packers victory 31-14 rather than 17-14, and a Redskins fan (or Vikings fan I guess) finds one play that went against them and argues the same thing in their favor. No one play ever determines the outcome of a game, so the idea that one lucky bounce is the difference between winning and losing is rediculous, because the other team could say the same thing about a completely different play (or set of plays). |
Yours:
Total: Rated 2 times. |
|
|
| RUFiO1984 - Two raw eggs in the morning 10/15/2007 @ 01:22:00 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| good point :) |
Yours:
Total: Rated 1 times. |
|
|
| Jeremy - 5014 Posts 10/15/2007 @ 02:22:50 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Scott Wrote - 10/14/2007 @ 08:43:47 PM I thought of something else about my rant about the officials. This is why it is rediculous to say things like "well, my team is really 2 plays away from being 5-0 instead of 3-2". Case in point, I argue that the Packers were 2 calls away from todays game being a Packers victory 31-14 rather than 17-14, and a Redskins fan (or Vikings fan I guess) finds one play that went against them and argues the same thing in their favor. No one play ever determines the outcome of a game, so the idea that one lucky bounce is the difference between winning and losing is rediculous, because the other team could say the same thing about a completely different play (or set of plays). Well, it's safe to say no football game has been the opening kickoff and no other plays were run. You could argue that everything in the world is the cumulative cause and effect of everything that put you into that moment. I do however think it's a gross over complication in the sports world, because the sports world has some finite borders. Obviously there were many many things that come down to a team setting up a field goal attempt down 2 with 1 second left. It would still be fair if someone discussed the outcome of that field goal as winning or losing them the game. If you would have made that field goal you would have won, so not making it lost. Also to argue this point you would have to argue, to a degree, that every play is of equal weight. The 67 yard touchdown run is equal to the 2 yard loss that put the team in that exact spot the play before. You could argue that the 67 yard run may never have happened had they not been in that exact spot and circumstances thanks to the -2 yard run and every single play before it, but I think that's a pretty gross over complication. Especially when you factor in that many scoring plays are only stopped by the endzone and are in a way, if you insist on waxing philosophical, infinite. Charles Woodson would have taken that fumble in yesterday if the goal line was 5, 10, 50, 100, or 400 yards away. To argue that that play wasn't the turning point in that game, and was rather just one of 100 plays that day, all of equal value, the sum total of which totaled up to 17-14 Packers, to me is just silly. If you don't want to bust chops for the sake of it everyone generally knows what someone means when they say "that holding penalty cost us the game." They don't mean they ran one play all day, it went for a touchdown, the refs called it back, ceremoniously awarded the other team a point for their effort, and the game ended then and there 1-0. Also I think you have to put a cap on the number of things you can do that with. If you do indeed have to point to a set of plays then odds are you're just reaching. edit: Also, I dont mean to sound like I'm piling on and dismissing this completely. Your point that in a lot of cases someone for team a saying "That penalty cost us a touchdown" could be met with a fan of team b saying "well the refs cost us 4 points on such and such when we had to settle for a field goal. I still think it's a little over-thinking to say "no one play ever determines the game." Plus not all "yeah-buts" are equal. The refs taking a touchdown off the board on a fishy holding call and someone countering with "well if receiver x could have held onto that TD it wouldn't have been an issue" is not equal because Team 1 did their part and got it taken away, Team 2 just has a list of "could haves." |
Yours:
Total: Rated 3 times. |
|
| Jeremy perfected this 2 times, last at 10/15/2007 2:44:51 pm | ||
|
| PackOne - 1134 Posts 10/15/2007 @ 09:00:35 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| Thats what you call a 67 candy corn post. |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
|
| Jeremy - Pie Racist 10/15/2007 @ 10:49:24 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| 67 Candy corns, but not enough to actually get a rating of any sort? |
Yours:
Total: Rated 1 times. |
|
|
| RUFiO1984 - I put my socks on the wrong feet. 10/16/2007 @ 07:00:06 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
| yes but thats a lot of candy corn! |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
|
| Scott - 2820 Posts 10/16/2007 @ 07:23:39 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
I think that was actually the play the Packers ran when Favre threw his record breaking touchdown. |
Yours:
Total: Rated 2 times. |
|
|
| Sarah - 1814 Posts 10/16/2007 @ 07:38:18 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
| http://www.nfl.com/probowl Vote Favre into the Pro Bowl! |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
|
| Jeremy - Corduroy pillows are making headlines 10/16/2007 @ 08:32:09 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Scott Wrote - 10/16/2007 @ 07:23:39 AM I think that was actually the play the Packers ran when Favre threw his record breaking touchdown. It was going to be, but then he checked to the 88 pancake slant. |
Yours:
Total: Rated 1 times. |
|
| Jeremy perfected this 2 times, last at 10/16/2007 12:34:55 pm | ||
|
| PackOne - She's just a woman. Never again. 10/17/2007 @ 06:00:48 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| Week 7 anyone ? Bueller? |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
|
| Scott - No, I did not change your screen saver settings 10/18/2007 @ 07:35:06 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
Vindicated!!! My rant was legit!!! The Packers officially got screwed, league officials report.  |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
|
| Sarah - 1814 Posts 10/18/2007 @ 07:44:39 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
I called it as it was happening! (as i was talking to myself on this blog) They're lucky we won... |
Yours: | |
Vikings 34 @ Bears 31
Jeremy: Look out Bears, the Vikings have had a full two weeks to make zero adjustments to the game plan in preparation for this one. Look for Adrian Peterson's slow faze out to continue. I predict a stat line of 3 rushes for 45 yards early in the first quarter and a benching to follow.Matt: Chester Taylor for MVP!!!!
Sarah: I don't care for either of these teams. I'd rather have the Vikings win if it came down to it.
Jon: Green Bay seemed to be able to run against Chicago easily at times. Of course, they also had to respect the passing game, but still I think Adrian Peterson can have some fun.