NFL 2007 Season Week 14 Picks
Create an Account or Login to make your own picks!These are not our most current picks!
Our freshest batch of picks are the NFL 2007 Season Super Bowl Picks.
 |  |  |  | |||||
| Bears 16 @ Redskins 24 Final Thu, 12/6/07 7:00pm NFLN
|
Bears
 |
Bears
|
Redskins
 |
Redskins
|
||||
| Dolphins 17 @ Bills 38 Final Sun, 12/9/07 12:00pm CBS
|
Bills
 |
Bills
|
Bills
|
Bills
|
||||
| Buccaneers 14 @ Texans 28 Final Sun, 12/9/07 12:00pm FOX
|
Buccaneers
 |
Buccaneers
|
Buccaneers
|
Texans
 |
||||
| Panthers 6 @ Jaguars 37 Final Sun, 12/9/07 12:00pm FOX
|
Jaguars
 |
Jaguars
|
Jaguars
|
Jaguars
|
||||
| Giants 16 @ Eagles 13 Final Sun, 12/9/07 12:00pm FOX
|
Giants
 |
Giants
|
Giants
|
Eagles
 |
||||
| Cowboys 28 @ Lions 27 Final Sun, 12/9/07 12:00pm FOX
|
Cowboys
 |
Cowboys
|
Cowboys
|
Cowboys
|
||||
| Chargers 23 @ Titans 17 F / OT Sun, 12/9/07 12:00pm CBS
|
Chargers
 |
Chargers
|
Titans
 |
Chargers
|
||||
| Raiders 7 @ Packers 38 Final Sun, 12/9/07 12:00pm CBS
|
Packers
 |
Raiders
 |
Packers
|
Packers
|
||||
| Rams 10 @ Bengals 19 Final Sun, 12/9/07 12:00pm FOX
|
Bengals
 |
Bengals
|
Bengals
|
Bengals
|
||||
| Vikings 27 @ 49ers 7 Final Sun, 12/9/07 3:05pm FOX
|
Vikings
 |
Vikings
|
Vikings
|
Vikings
|
||||
| Cardinals 21 @ Seahawks 42 Final Sun, 12/9/07 3:05pm FOX
|
Seahawks
 |
Seahawks
|
Seahawks
|
Seahawks
|
||||
| Chiefs 7 @ Broncos 41 Final Sun, 12/9/07 3:15pm CBS
|
Broncos
 |
Broncos
|
Broncos
|
Broncos
|
||||
| Steelers 13 @ Patriots 34 Final Sun, 12/9/07 3:15pm CBS
|
Patriots
 |
Patriots
|
Patriots
|
Patriots
|
||||
| Browns 24 @ Jets 18 Final Sun, 12/9/07 3:15pm CBS
|
Browns
 |
Jets
 |
Browns
|
Browns
|
||||
| Colts 44 @ Ravens 20 Final Sun, 12/9/07 7:15pm NBC
|
Colts
 |
Colts
|
Colts
|
Colts
|
||||
| Saints 34 @ Falcons 14 Final Mon, 12/10/07 7:30pm ESPN
|
Saints
 |
Saints
|
Saints
|
Saints
|
||||
| Week Record | 14 - 2 0.875  | 12 - 4 0.750 | 14 - 2 0.875 | 15 - 1 0.938  | ||||
| Season Record | 135 - 73 0.649 | 125 - 83 0.601 | 138 - 70 0.663 | 143 - 65 0.688 | ||||
| Lifetime Record | 977 - 565 - 1 0.633 | 888 - 654 - 1 0.576 | 958 - 584 - 1 0.621 | 954 - 588 - 1 0.618 |
Bills
Buccaneers
Jaguars
Eagles
Cowboys
Chargers
Packers
Bengals
Vikings
Seahawks
Broncos
Patriots
Browns
Colts
Saints
| Week: | 14 - 2 0.875 |
| Season: | 131 - 77 0.630 |
| Lifetime: | 300 - 175 0.632 |
Bills
Buccaneers
Jaguars
Eagles
Cowboys
Titans
Packers
Rams
49ers
Seahawks
Broncos
Patriots
Browns
Colts
Saints
| Week: | 11 - 5 0.688 |
| Season: | 133 - 75 0.639 |
| Lifetime: | 283 - 191 0.597 |
Bills
Texans
Jaguars
Eagles
Cowboys
Titans
Packers
Bengals
Vikings
Seahawks
Broncos
Steelers
Browns
Colts
Saints
| Week: | 12 - 4 0.750 |
| Season: | 131 - 77 0.630 |
| Lifetime: | 288 - 184 0.610 |
Bills
Buccaneers
Jaguars
Giants
Cowboys
Chargers
Packers
Bengals
Vikings
Seahawks
Broncos
Steelers
Browns
Colts
Saints
| Week: | 13 - 3 0.812 |
| Season: | 133 - 75 0.639 |
| Lifetime: | 133 - 75 0.639 |
Bills
Buccaneers
Jaguars
Giants
Cowboys
Chargers
Packers
Bengals
Vikings
Seahawks
Chiefs
Patriots
Browns
Colts
Saints
| Week: | 14 - 2 0.875 |
| Season: | 128 - 80 0.615 |
| Lifetime: | 128 - 80 0.615 |
![IMG_3063[1].jpg](/images/thumbnail.php?height=18&file=/uploads/IMG_3063[1].jpg)
Bills
Buccaneers
Jaguars
Eagles
Cowboys
Chargers
Packers
Bengals
Vikings
Seahawks
Broncos
Patriots
Browns
Colts
Falcons
| Week: | 12 - 3 0.800 |
| Season: | 102 - 62 0.622 |
| Lifetime: | 102 - 62 0.622 |
Bills
Buccaneers
Jaguars
Giants
Cowboys
Titans
Packers
Rams
Vikings
Seahawks
Broncos
Patriots
Browns
Colts
Saints
| Week: | 13 - 3 0.812 |
| Season: | 126 - 68 0.649 |
| Lifetime: | 126 - 68 0.649 |
Dolphins
Buccaneers
Jaguars
Eagles
Lions
Titans
Packers
Bengals
Vikings
Seahawks
Broncos
Steelers
Browns
Colts
Saints
| Week: | 10 - 6 0.625 |
| Season: | 88 - 58 0.603 |
| Lifetime: | 88 - 58 0.603 |
Bills
Texans
Jaguars
Giants
Cowboys
Chargers
Packers
Bengals
Vikings
Seahawks
Broncos
Patriots
Browns
Colts
Saints
| Week: | 15 - 1 0.938 |
| Season: | 107 - 39 0.733 |
| Lifetime: | 107 - 39 0.733 |
Bills
Buccaneers
Jaguars
Giants
Cowboys
Titans
Packers
Rams
Vikings
Seahawks
Broncos
Steelers
Browns
Colts
Falcons
| Week: | 11 - 5 0.688 |
| Season: | 54 - 37 0.593 |
| Lifetime: | 54 - 37 0.593 |
Bills
Buccaneers
Jaguars
Giants
Cowboys
Titans
Packers
Bengals
Vikings
Seahawks
Broncos
Patriots
Browns
Colts
Saints
| Week: | 13 - 3 0.812 |
| Season: | 64 - 28 0.696 |
| Lifetime: | 64 - 28 0.696 |
Dolphins
Buccaneers
Jaguars
Eagles
Cowboys
Chargers
Packers
Bengals
Vikings
Seahawks
Chiefs
Patriots
Browns
Colts
Saints
| Week: | 11 - 5 0.688 |
| Season: | 38 - 22 0.633 |
| Lifetime: | 38 - 22 0.633 |
Bills
Buccaneers
Jaguars
Eagles
Cowboys
Chargers
Packers
Bengals
Vikings
Seahawks
Broncos
Patriots
Browns
Colts
Saints
| Week: | 14 - 2 0.875 |
| Season: | 49 - 29 0.628 |
| Lifetime: | 49 - 29 0.628 |
Bills
Buccaneers
Jaguars
Giants
Cowboys
Chargers
Packers
Bengals
Vikings
Seahawks
Broncos
Patriots
Browns
Colts
Saints
| Week: | 14 - 2 0.875 |
| Season: | 49 - 29 0.628 |
| Lifetime: | 49 - 29 0.628 |
Bills
Buccaneers
Jaguars
Giants
Lions
Titans
Packers
Rams
Vikings
Cardinals
Broncos
Steelers
Jets
Colts
Saints
| Week: | 8 - 7 0.533 |
| Season: | 33 - 28 0.541 |
| Lifetime: | 33 - 28 0.541 |
Bills
Buccaneers
Jaguars
Giants
Cowboys
Titans
Packers
Bengals
Vikings
Seahawks
Broncos
Steelers
Browns
Colts
Saints
| Week: | 12 - 3 0.800 |
| Season: | 42 - 19 0.689 |
| Lifetime: | 42 - 19 0.689 |
Bills
Buccaneers
Jaguars
Giants
Cowboys
Chargers
Packers
Bengals
Vikings
Seahawks
Broncos
Steelers
Browns
Colts
Saints
| Week: | 13 - 3 0.812 |
| Season: | 43 - 21 0.672 |
| Lifetime: | 43 - 21 0.672 |
Bills
Buccaneers
Jaguars
Eagles
Cowboys
Chargers
Packers
Bengals
Vikings
Seahawks
Broncos
Patriots
Browns
Colts
Saints
| Week: | 13 - 3 0.812 |
| Season: | 47 - 17 0.734 |
| Lifetime: | 47 - 17 0.734 |
Create an Account or Login to make your own picks!
Raiders 7 @ Packers 38
Jeremy: If the Packers lose this game then all bets are off. The Vikings turned the ball over like 7 million times and still beat the Raiders. The Raiders are just an awful awful team.Sarah: It's been a long time since I've seen some Packer football. Favre's winning of the Sportsman of the Year got me thinking. Maybe he didn't have the best year out of everyone, but he did break a lot a records. MVP MVP MVP MVP
Matt: The Raiders are on a roll. Oakland 27, Green Bay 21
Jon: Packers' losing streak continues? Probably not, but it wouldn't hurt.
Vikings 27 @ 49ers 7
Jeremy: The Vikings average margin of victory is 17.5 points. Their average margin of loss is 10.67. Factor out their best and worst games and it's 14.6 and 6 respectively. A few weeks ago the Giants and Lions looked like locks for the two wildcard spots. The Vikings outscored them by a combined 52 points. They held the Cowboys, who were at home, to fewer points than anyone all season. What am I trying to say here? Perhaps the 0-34 Packer game was the anomaly, and not the crushing of the Chargers, Lions, and Giants, who could all be playoff teams. Everything seems to be falling into place for the Vikes to make their annual run at being the best team to not make the playoffs, costing themselves about 12 spots in the draft in the process.Sarah: The Vikings are back in the playoff hunt.
Matt: Ray Edwards is not here to talk about the past.
Jon: Minnesota is the hot team! So they'll probably lose. Still, they've sure become quite the high scoring team again.
Colts 44 @ Ravens 20
Jeremy: Oh those poor Ravens. Boy, did they get hosed.Sarah: Stupid Ravens.
Matt: P-Man for MVP!!!!
Jon: The NFL has decided the Colts will win this, right?
Saints 34 @ Falcons 14
Jeremy: I'm sure going into the season this game seemed like a good idea.Sarah: I was sooo tempted to pick the Steelers.
Matt: Pass
Jon: No one wants to watch this. Actually, I'd maybe watch if I wasn't busy Monday night.
 | Jfk10intex - Brett Favre going to the Super Bowl =] 12/05/2007 @ 07:17:15 AM |
 |
|---|---|---|
| lol.... steelers???? why did u put that in the saints @ falcons game? |
Yours:
 
Rated 0 times. |
|
 | RUFiO1984 - 110 Posts 12/05/2007 @ 07:30:44 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Jfk10intex Wrote - 12/05/2007 @ 07:17:15 AM lol.... steelers???? why did u put that in the saints @ falcons game? possibly doesnt care for the saints or falcons enough to comment on them, So talked about a different game!! :) |
Yours:
Total:   Rated 2 times. |
|
|
| Carlos44ec - 1204 Posts 12/05/2007 @ 07:54:00 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Or she could have put the wrong comment in the box, but I think she was commenting on the game being so damned boring that she would be watching the Steelers? That is my bet. FYI I took the Packers to the Raiders in Madden 2k5. 98-0. I then took the Packers to the Bills, 118-6 (missed extra point). Favre had a combined 1500 passing yards in those games. |
Yours:
Total: Rated 1 times. |
|
| Carlos44ec messed with this at 12/05/2007 7:55:05 am | ||
 | Sarah (Guest) 12/05/2007 @ 09:11:12 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
RUFiO1984 Wrote - 12/05/2007 @ 07:30:44 AM Jfk10intex Wrote - 12/05/2007 @ 07:17:15 AM possibly doesnt care for the saints or falcons enough to comment on them, So talked about a different game!! :)lol.... steelers???? why did u put that in the saints @ falcons game? Bingo Bango! Hi from Florida! |
Yours:
Total: Rated 1 times. |
|
|
| Scott - If you aren't enough without it, you'll never be enough with it. 12/05/2007 @ 11:41:05 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
| Hi |
Yours:
Total: Rated 2 times. |
|
 | Jeremy - 5014 Posts 12/05/2007 @ 11:43:28 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
| Screw you guys, I have to go snow blower shopping tonight. Incidentally, is "Snow Blower" a regional thing, because everyone else (especially businesses) seems to call them "Snow Throwers." |
Yours:
Total: Rated 1 times. |
|
|
| Scott - You're going to have to call your hardware guy. It's not a software issue. 12/05/2007 @ 11:50:35 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
| Who's everyone else? I always thought they were called snow blowers. "Snow Thrower" sounds more like the person in your snow ball fighting squad who has the best arm. Tell that to the next person that tries to sell you a "snow thrower". |
Yours:
Total:  Rated 1 times. |
|
|
| Scott - 2820 Posts 12/05/2007 @ 12:24:40 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| Matt Hasselbeck is pretty funny. |
Yours:
Total: Rated 1 times. |
|
| Scott edited this at 12/05/2007 12:29:22 pm | ||
|
| Jeremy - 1.21 Gigawatts!?!? 12/05/2007 @ 12:33:03 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| I had to refresh the page a couple times to actually get Hasselbeck's, it was pretty funny, I guess. I think that kind of stuff goes on all the time though. |
Yours:
Total: Rated 2 times. |
|
|
| Scott - 2820 Posts 12/05/2007 @ 12:48:18 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| probably. Some of the videos are fairly funny, some are just weird. |
Yours:
Total: Rated 1 times. |
|
|
| Alex - 2058 Posts 12/05/2007 @ 12:56:08 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| I partially picked the 49ers just cause they're not the Vikings, but I was suprised to see I'm the only one out of 14 so far to do so. I think Jeremy is switching people's picks when they're not looking... |
Yours:
Total: Rated 1 times. |
|
|
| Scott - Ma'am, can you make sure your computer is turned on? 12/05/2007 @ 01:50:40 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Well, from what I see, Jeremy did pick the Packers. My feeling with the Vikings right now is this: Which Vikings team with show up. Will it the team that got blown out by the Packers, or will it be the team that crushed the Giants and the Lions? I think we're more likely to see something closer to the former from here on out, which is why I really hope the Vikings don't make the playoffs. They are one of a few teams that I really would rather not have to face again. (that list probably includes the Giants as well). |
Yours:
Total: Rated 1 times. |
|
|
| Jeremy - 1.21 Gigawatts!?!? 12/05/2007 @ 02:47:06 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| The Packers game was a catalyst for some defensive changes the players have been bugging the coaches to make all season, so far so good on those. I forget the details, I think the gist was that the "Stand in our zones and watch the other team play catch 'Cover 2'" had to go. They've looked like a different team since then, not to mention T-Jack is playing better too. |
Yours:
Total: Rated 3 times. |
|
|
| Jfk10intex - Brett Favre going to the Super Bowl =] 12/05/2007 @ 03:02:39 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Alex Wrote - 12/05/2007 @ 12:56:08 PM I partially picked the 49ers just cause they're not the Vikings, but I was suprised to see I'm the only one out of 14 so far to do so. I think Jeremy is switching people's picks when they're not looking... your kidding right???? if not thats the stupidest comment i have read on the site so far = |
Yours:
Total: Rated 3 times. |
|
|
| Matt - 1436 Posts 12/05/2007 @ 03:03:07 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Scott Wrote - 12/05/2007 @ 01:50:40 PM Well, from what I see, Jeremy did pick the Packers. My feeling with the Vikings right now is this: Which Vikings team with show up. Will it the team that got blown out by the Packers, or will it be the team that crushed the Giants and the Lions? I think we're more likely to see something closer to the former from here on out, which is why I really hope the Vikings don't make the playoffs. They are one of a few teams that I really would rather not have to face again. (that list probably includes the Giants as well). So you don't want to play the Vikings again, because you think they are going to start playing badly again? |
Yours:
Total: Rated 1 times. |
|
|
| Jfk10intex - Brett Favre going to the Super Bowl =] 12/05/2007 @ 03:04:16 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Matt Wrote - 12/05/2007 @ 03:03:07 PM Scott Wrote - 12/05/2007 @ 01:50:40 PM So you don't want to play the Vikings again, because you think they are going to start playing badly again?Well, from what I see, Jeremy did pick the Packers. My feeling with the Vikings right now is this: Which Vikings team with show up. Will it the team that got blown out by the Packers, or will it be the team that crushed the Giants and the Lions? I think we're more likely to see something closer to the former from here on out, which is why I really hope the Vikings don't make the playoffs. They are one of a few teams that I really would rather not have to face again. (that list probably includes the Giants as well). no he doesnt want to play them cause they will lose to the vikings..... the vikings have found their way and they look good.. |
Yours:
Total: Rated 1 times. |
|
|
| Matt - 1436 Posts 12/05/2007 @ 03:05:15 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Jfk10intex Wrote - 12/05/2007 @ 03:02:39 PM if not thats the stupidest comment i have read on the site so far = Words escape me at the moment. |
Yours:
Total: Rated 1 times. |
|
| Matt messed with this at 12/05/2007 3:05:32 pm | ||
|
| Matt - Nutcan.com's MBL 12/05/2007 @ 03:06:53 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Brett Favre hates kids. Some Sportsman of the Year he is. |
Yours:
Total: Rated 2 times. |
|
|
| Jfk10intex - 100 Posts 12/05/2007 @ 03:08:06 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
and he has kid(s).... so i dont think he hates them.................. Matt Wrote - 12/05/2007 @ 03:05:15 PM Jfk10intex Wrote - 12/05/2007 @ 03:02:39 PM Words escape me at the moment.if not thats the stupidest comment i have read on the site so far = close the door and that wont happen.... |
Yours:
Total: Rated 3 times. |
|
|
| Jeremy - I believe virtually everything I read. 12/05/2007 @ 03:17:43 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Can someone tell me why if the playoffs started today the Cardinals would get in over the Vikings. The standings seem to say otherwise. Is it some lame 3-way-tie rule? |
Yours:
Total: Rated 1 times. |
|
| Jeremy perfected this at 12/05/2007 3:19:48 pm | ||
|
| Matt - 1436 Posts 12/05/2007 @ 03:35:52 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| Going by this, since its a 3-way tie and the Vikings and Lions are in the same division, divisional tie-breakers apply first between them and the "winner" then goes to the tiebreak w/the Cardinals. Since the Lions and Vikings split, it goes to best winning percentage in division games, which the Lions have the advantage in. |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
| Matt messed with this 2 times, last at 12/05/2007 3:47:43 pm | ||
|
| Jeremy - 5014 Posts 12/05/2007 @ 03:45:54 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| Gotcha, luckily for us the Lions have a pretty rough schedule, or at least teams that can be tough. Green Bay might not have anything to play for. |
Yours:
Total: Rated 1 times. |
|
|
| Scott - 2820 Posts 12/05/2007 @ 03:50:37 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
Luckily for the rest of us the Vikings actually suck. Ha, watcha think about that.  |
Yours:
Total: Rated 1 times. |
|
|
| Alex - 2058 Posts 12/05/2007 @ 06:58:51 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Jeremy Wrote - 12/05/2007 @ 02:47:06 PM The Packers game was a catalyst for some defensive changes the players have been bugging the coaches to make all season, so far so good on those. I forget the details, I think the gist was that the "Stand in our zones and watch the other team play catch 'Cover 2'" had to go. They've looked like a different team since then, not to mention T-Jack is playing better too. Whilst I don't doubt the validitity of your analysis, they've also played 2 home games against terrible and/or terrible on the road teams and also had Eli pretty much gift wrap and put a cherry on top of the other game. I'd just hate to see all the Vikings fans get their hopes up only to be dashed when they can't win on the road in Denver. Wait, forget I said anything, I'm sure the Vikings have been a juggernaut in disguise all year long.  Actually I can see the Lions ending up 7-9 and the Vikings and Cardinals both going 8-8. Which might leave the door open for my mid-season pick of New Orleans to slide | ||
Bears 16 @ Redskins 24
Jeremy: This one is a tough call. On one hand the Redskins have just had too much going on this week. On the other hand the funeral could "galvanize" the team.Sarah: Insert semi-witty comment later - I'm headed to Florida!
Matt: I'm not quite sure what to make of the Bears.
Jon: Chicago is all over the place.