NFL 2006 Season Week 2 Picks

Create an Account or Login to make your own picks!

These are not our most current picks!
Our freshest batch of picks are the NFL 2018 Season Super Bowl Picks.

Jeremy's PicksMatt's PicksJon's PicksSarah's Picks
Bills 16 @ Dolphins 6
Final
Sun, 9/17/06 12:00pm
2 Picks - 25% 6 Picks - 75%
Dolphins
Dolphins
Dolphins
Dolphins
Dolphins
Dolphins
Bills
Bills
Buccaneers 3 @ Falcons 14
Final
Sun, 9/17/06 12:00pm
1 Pick - 13% 7 Picks - 87%
Falcons
Falcons
Buccaneers
Buccaneers
Falcons
Falcons
Falcons
Falcons
Saints 34 @ Packers 27
Final
Sun, 9/17/06 12:00pm
4 Picks - 50% 4 Picks - 50%
Saints
Saints
Saints
Saints
Saints
Saints
Packers
Packers
Panthers 13 @ Vikings 16
Final-OT
Sun, 9/17/06 12:00pm
2 Picks - 25% 6 Picks - 75%
Vikings
Vikings
Vikings
Vikings
Vikings
Vikings
Panthers
Panthers
Lions 7 @ Bears 34
Final
Sun, 9/17/06 12:00pm
1 Pick - 13% 7 Picks - 87%
Bears
Bears
Lions
Lions
Bears
Bears
Bears
Bears
Giants 30 @ Eagles 24
Final-OT
Sun, 9/17/06 12:00pm
3 Picks - 38% 5 Picks - 62%
Eagles
Eagles
Giants
Giants
Giants
Giants
Eagles
Eagles
Raiders 6 @ Ravens 28
Final
Sun, 9/17/06 12:00pm
0 Picks - 0% 8 Picks - 100%
Ravens
Ravens
Ravens
Ravens
Ravens
Ravens
Ravens
Ravens
Texans 24 @ Colts 43
Final
Sun, 9/17/06 12:00pm
0 Picks - 0% 8 Picks - 100%
Colts
Colts
Colts
Colts
Colts
Colts
Colts
Colts
Browns 17 @ Bengals 34
Final
Sun, 9/17/06 12:00pm
0 Picks - 0% 8 Picks - 100%
Bengals
Bengals
Bengals
Bengals
Bengals
Bengals
Bengals
Bengals
Chiefs 6 @ Broncos 9
Final-OT
Sun, 9/17/06 3:05pm
2 Picks - 25% 6 Picks - 75%
Broncos
Broncos
Broncos
Broncos
Broncos
Broncos
Broncos
Broncos
Cardinals 10 @ Seahawks 21
Final
Sun, 9/17/06 3:05pm
2 Picks - 25% 6 Picks - 75%
Seahawks
Seahawks
Cardinals
Cardinals
Seahawks
Seahawks
Cardinals
Cardinals
Rams 13 @ 49ers 20
Final
Sun, 9/17/06 3:05pm
8 Picks - 100% 0 Picks - 0%
Rams
Rams
Rams
Rams
Rams
Rams
Rams
Rams
Titans 7 @ Chargers 40
Final
Sun, 9/17/06 3:15pm
0 Picks - 0% 8 Picks - 100%
Chargers
Chargers
Chargers
Chargers
Chargers
Chargers
Chargers
Chargers
Patriots 24 @ Jets 17
Final
Sun, 9/17/06 3:15pm
7 Picks - 88% 1 Pick - 12%
Patriots
Patriots
Jets
Jets
Patriots
Patriots
Patriots
Patriots
Redskins 10 @ Cowboys 27
Final
Sun, 9/17/06 7:15pm
2 Picks - 25% 6 Picks - 75%
Cowboys
Cowboys
Cowboys
Cowboys
Cowboys
Cowboys
Cowboys
Cowboys
Steelers 0 @ Jaguars 9
Final
Mon, 9/18/06 7:30pm
4 Picks - 50% 4 Picks - 50%
Steelers
Steelers
Steelers
Steelers
Steelers
Steelers
Jaguars
Jaguars
Week Record12 - 4
0.750
9 - 7
0.562
Worst Place
13 - 3
0.812
First Place
11 - 5
0.688
Season Record23 - 9
0.719
20 - 12
0.625
23 - 9
0.719
20 - 12
0.625
No-Pack-Vike Record2517 - 1476
0.630
2447 - 1546
0.613
2530 - 1463
0.634
2492 - 1501
0.624
Lifetime Record700 - 399
0.637
631 - 468
0.574
693 - 406
0.631
679 - 420
0.618
click me!
Other Nut Canner Picks
scott.jpg
Dolphins
Falcons
Packers
Vikings
Bears
Eagles
Ravens
Colts
Bengals
Broncos
Seahawks
Rams
Chargers
Patriots
Cowboys
Jaguars

Week:12 - 4
0.750
Season:20 - 12
0.625
Lifetime:20 - 12
0.625
newalex.jpg
Bills
Falcons
Packers
Vikings
Bears
Eagles
Ravens
Colts
Bengals
Chiefs
Seahawks
Rams
Chargers
Patriots
Redskins
Jaguars

Week:11 - 5
0.688
Season:17 - 15
0.531
Lifetime:17 - 15
0.531
reign_of_fire_150.jpg
Dolphins
Falcons
Packers
Vikings
Bears
Giants
Ravens
Colts
Bengals
Broncos
Seahawks
Rams
Chargers
Patriots
Redskins
Jaguars

Week:12 - 4
0.750
Season:22 - 9
0.710
Lifetime:22 - 9
0.710
goodlooking.jpg
Dolphins
Falcons
Saints
Panthers
Bears
Eagles
Ravens
Colts
Bengals
Chiefs
Seahawks
Rams
Chargers
Patriots
Cowboys
Steelers

Week:10 - 6
0.625
Season:23 - 9
0.719
Lifetime:23 - 9
0.719
Create an Account or Login to make your own picks!

Saints 34 @ Packers 27

jeremy.jpg
Jeremy
I almost picked the Packers. Tough start for them though. Maybe they can earn their way up from the bottom of the Power Rankings. Maybe it'll even be 3243 - 0 again so we can hear all year about how despite not winning a game in 4 months the Packers have outscored their opponents.
matt.jpg
Matt
Question for the Packer fans here at the Can... If for some reason, the Saints wanted to trade Reggie Bush for Brett Favre straight up, would you approve?
jon.jpg
Jon
Remember Packer fans, in 2003 the Patriots lost 31-0 in their opening game. They won the Super Bowl that season.
sarah.jpg
Sarah
This should be a good one... We have a chance to actually win a game. Although, this could be the game Reggie Bush rushes for 400 yards and 5 TDs to become an instant HOFer.

Panthers 13 @ Vikings 16

jeremy.jpg
Jeremy
I've yet to pick against the Vikes, you think I'm going to start now? Besides, this one's at home. Home opener baby!! I'm coming home voiceless.
matt.jpg
Matt
Steve Smith crawls to 3 TDs, but the Vikings still win 24 - 21.
jon.jpg
Jon
In the first NFL regular season game that I attended, the Vikings kicked off to the Panthers to start the game and the Panthers returned it for a touchdown. The Panthers went on to win the game and never won a game the rest of the year. The kick returner, by the way, was a not-yet well known Steve Smith.
sarah.jpg
Sarah
Even though the Panthers played HORRIBLY, I still have a gut feeling that the Vikings will let the non-decent people of Minnesota down.

Redskins 10 @ Cowboys 27

jeremy.jpg
Jeremy
T.O. T.O. T.O. T.O. T.O. T.O. T.O. T.O. T.O. T.O. T.O. T.O. T.O. T.O. T.O. T.O. T.O. T.O. T.O. T.O. T.O. T.O. T.O. T.O. T.O. T.O. T.O. T.O. T.O. T.O. T.O. T.O. T.O. T.O. T.O. T.O. T.O. T.O. T.O. T.O. T.O. T.O. T.O. T.O.
matt.jpg
Matt
I don't like either of these teams.
jon.jpg
Jon
I feel like the Cowboys could easily lose. But so could the Washington team. Ever notice how much time the media spends on Dallas? I'm not really complaining, it's just interesting that between the press on T.O. and Bledsoe and Parcells, I feel like they're the local team.
sarah.jpg
Sarah
I care why?

Steelers 0 @ Jaguars 9

jeremy.jpg
Jeremy
It's week 2 and these two teams could be fairly evenly matched, but that wont stop everyone from claiming 'What an upset' it would be for the Jaguars.
matt.jpg
Matt
Chas. Batch for MVP!!!
jon.jpg
Jon
Everyone seems to be talking about how the Jaguars are kind of the forgotten team; and I agree. I think the Steelers are better.
sarah.jpg
Sarah
I think Roethlisberger will not do well and since my most hated Steeler player might not be playing, the Jaguars could win. Really? No Samkon anymore? I still can't believe it.
scott.jpgScott - 6225 Posts
09/14/2006 @ 11:34:54 AM
 Quote this comment
NutCan's Junior staff members are on top of things this week.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
jeremy.jpgJeremy - 1.21 Gigawatts!?!?
09/14/2006 @ 11:46:59 AM
 Quote this comment
Too bad the same cant be said about the rest of the lackadaisical Sr. Staff.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
matt.jpgMatt - Washington Bureau Chief
09/14/2006 @ 12:54:57 PM
 Quote this comment
There are no early games this week, so I don't see why anyone would want to do their picks before Thursday afternoon.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Total:

Rated 2 times.
fry6beeu9.jpgJeremy - As Seen On The Internet
09/14/2006 @ 01:02:18 PM
 Quote this comment
Because people start looking for them around wednesday.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
scott.jpgScott - 6225 Posts
09/14/2006 @ 01:06:44 PM
 Quote this comment
At least keep up with the ESPN Expert Picks, and they usually do their picking on thursday sometime. Thursday should probably the deadline.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Total:

Rated 1 times.
jeremy.jpgJeremy - 8953 Posts
09/14/2006 @ 02:28:08 PM
 Quote this comment
It's supposed to be. Or at least that was the General understanding last year.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Total:

Rated 1 times.
thumbnailCAW1I0O3.gifMatt - 3355 Posts
09/14/2006 @ 05:11:26 PM
 Quote this comment
Yeah, Thursday inclusive.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Total:

Rated 2 times.
fry6beeu9.jpgJeremy - I believe virtually everything I read.
09/14/2006 @ 05:32:19 PM
 Quote this comment
No, Wednesday night.

Actually I thought about "making it live" automatically at midnight Wednesday, whether or not everyone's picks are in, cause that's when people start looking.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Total:

Rated 2 times.
matt.jpgMatt - 3355 Posts
09/14/2006 @ 05:35:00 PM
 Quote this comment
Who are these people you are referring to?
Rate this comment
Yours:

Total:

Rated 2 times.
jeremy.jpgJeremy - Robots don't say 'ye'
09/14/2006 @ 05:36:47 PM
 Quote this comment
You know, the peoples. The interweb searchers.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
scott.jpgScott - Ma'am, can you make sure your computer is turned on?
09/15/2006 @ 09:02:09 AM
 Quote this comment
Somebody is actually excited to play a team that will probably finish with no more than 6 wins, and that's being generous. With this much enthusiasm, I'm not convinced that K-Rob isn't still drunk or high. It just wouldn't make any sense. Either way, he'll probably return a kick for a touchdown or something like that and we'll forget about the whole thing.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
Scott edited this at 09/15/2006 9:02:16 am
scott.jpgScott - On your mark...get set...Terrible!
09/15/2006 @ 09:05:31 AM
 Quote this comment
URGENT!!!! You forgot RAMS vs 49ERS!!!!! URGENT!!!
Rate this comment
Yours:

Total:

Rated 2 times.
fry6beeu9.jpgJeremy - 8953 Posts
09/15/2006 @ 09:21:55 AM
 Quote this comment
Hmm. So I did.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
jon.jpgJon - Nutcan.com's kitten expert
09/15/2006 @ 12:56:13 PM
 Quote this comment
Talk about being lakadaisical.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
fry6beeu9.jpgJeremy - 8953 Posts
09/15/2006 @ 01:25:20 PM
 Quote this comment
Well luckily Scott put on on DEFCON 5.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
jon.jpgJon - 2847 Posts
09/15/2006 @ 01:44:25 PM
 Quote this comment
DEFCON 5 is actually the lowest level.
Maybe that's what you were going for.
DEFCON 1 is the highest level.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
jeremy.jpgJeremy - 8953 Posts
09/15/2006 @ 01:54:17 PM
 Quote this comment
Actually I meant 4, but I messed the comment up so badly ("on on") that I decided to just leave it all and look like an idiot.

Mission Accomplished.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
scott.jpgScott - Resident Tech Support
09/15/2006 @ 02:26:28 PM
 Quote this comment
so, are we forgoing the rams-49ers game this week?
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
jeremy.jpgJeremy - 8953 Posts
09/15/2006 @ 02:43:52 PM
 Quote this comment
I can't add it from work. Well, I can, but I shouldn't.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
jeremy.jpgJeremy - Super Chocolate Bear
09/15/2006 @ 05:04:38 PM
 Quote this comment
Ok there it is!! Pick everyone!!
Rate this comment
Yours:

Total:

Rated 1 times.
scott.jpgScott - No, I did not change your screen saver settings
09/17/2006 @ 12:00:01 PM
 Quote this comment
ok, and Vikings suck

actually I might find myself rooting for the vikings at some point this season. I mean, if the Packers are going to suck, I want one of the North teams to be good.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
scott.jpgScott - 6225 Posts
09/17/2006 @ 12:36:56 PM
 Quote this comment
The Packers are a completely different team this week. 3 turnovers already in the first quarter, lots of offense, Driver is playing above his ability so far. Let's play the Saints every week.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
scott.jpgScott - Resident Tech Support
09/17/2006 @ 01:37:08 PM
 Quote this comment
that was a more realistic second qtr. I realize that nobody is online, so I'm pretty much just talking to myself.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
hoochpage.JPGSarah - 4091 Posts
09/17/2006 @ 04:39:59 PM
 Quote this comment
Turrible. Anyway FYI Jeremy has 175 fantasy pts with 2 players still needing to finish their games. THe next closest is Micah with 105, but he still has 6 players playing. Wow.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
jeremy.jpgJeremy - 8953 Posts
09/17/2006 @ 07:02:59 PM
 Quote this comment
I am awesome-o.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
scott.jpgScott - 6225 Posts
09/18/2006 @ 08:18:56 AM
 Quote this comment
man, if only I had started Vick and Greg Jennings.

And Favre played a pretty good game. I actually started him over Jake Delhomme in my other league; it turned out to be a really good move.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
2887.gifAlex - 3618 Posts
09/18/2006 @ 08:23:08 AM
 Quote this comment
There's a poll on ESPN right now about "Which is the worst team in the NFL?" and the Packers aren't even a choice! Clearly it's the Raiders anyway (68%), but I'm surprised to see the Lions as a choice instead of the Packers.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
scott.jpgScott - No, I did not change your screen saver settings
09/18/2006 @ 08:32:45 AM
 Quote this comment
Who's worse, the Bucs or the Raiders. Both are teams with Pirate Mascots, (that's interesting). The Bucs are averaging 1.3 points per game, while the Raiders are averaging a high powered 3 points per game. Man, I'm glad there are still a few teams capable of taking the pressure off Green Bay for being the worst teams in the league.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
scott.jpgScott - 6225 Posts
09/18/2006 @ 08:33:28 AM
 Quote this comment
the Lions have only scored 13 points in 2 games. I think the Bucs are worse than the Raiders, honestly.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
jeremy.jpgJeremy - 8953 Posts
09/18/2006 @ 08:33:42 AM
 Quote this comment
The Buc's woes seem much more curable.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
scott.jpgScott - No, I did not change your screen saver settings
09/18/2006 @ 08:35:14 AM
 Quote this comment
probably. But honestly, who should the Packers pick with the number 1 overall draft pick? Is there another guy like reggie bush again this year?
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
fry6beeu9.jpgJeremy - 8953 Posts
09/18/2006 @ 02:28:23 PM
 Quote this comment
I don't follow college football, but I don't think there is. I don't think you're headed for the #1 pick anyway.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
jeremy.jpgJeremy - 8953 Posts
09/18/2006 @ 04:08:30 PM
 Quote this comment
Erasmus James (knee) is out for the season with a torn anterior cruciate ligament in his left knee.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
jon.jpgJon - 1 bajillion posts
09/18/2006 @ 05:17:26 PM
 Quote this comment
Time for my week 2 thoughts.
I'm pretty pleased with Brad Childress and the Vikings. (There's a great ESPN Magazine article on him in the recent issue.) Obviously, we've had two close wins against opponents of questionable quality, but it's still two wins and the Vikings have played pretty well. One thing I am a little disappointed with, if you can call it that, is Childress's decision (I assume it's his) to kick the long field goal. In the first week the Vikings went for a 54 yard field goal in the fourth quarter. That would have tied Longwell's career long. He missed. In my opinion, that was the third best option there after punting and going for it. This week, in the third quarter, Longwell attempted a 51 yard field goal that was blocked. Again, I felt that it was probably the third best option there, maybe second best. Longwell is a pretty good kicker from deep, but even so, that's good field position to give to a team when you end up missing, especially in a close game. It's a minor complaint, and maybe it seems like I'm nitpicking, but it's bothered me both times. I've now seen Longwell attempt three long field goals this season (1 was in preseason) and if memory serves, he's 0-3. It might mean nothing, but I hope that if he doesn't have the range anymore, we don't keep going for it.
Also, among the rules I'd like to see change in football, this might be the top on the list: If you fumble and it goes into the end zone you're going toward and it goes out of bounds, it's a touchback. I've had a problem with this for a little while now, and Matt and I even discussed it yesterday. It's a disproportionate "penalty" for what actually happens. I mean, if you fumble the ball and it goes out of bounds at the half inch line, you retain the ball and get it where you fumbled from. If it goes out a half inch in the end zone, the other team gets the ball at the 20. Now, yes, it's a game of inches and the end zone is different, but why should possession change only on those fumbles? As matt pointed out, other touchbacks occur when the team receiving the kick, or interception, downs the ball or goes out of bounds in the end zone. That team gets the ball at the 20, but they were the team that had the ball anyway. On the fumbling situation, we already know that fumbling out of bounds doesn't change possession in regular territory, so when you fumble out of bounds in the end zone why should that be a touchback situation for the team that otherwise wouldn't have gotten the ball at anywhere else on the field? It doesn't really make much sense.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Total:

Rated 1 times.
scott.jpgScott - You're going to have to call your hardware guy. It's not a software issue.
09/18/2006 @ 06:18:51 PM
 Quote this comment
Longwell never had much range. it took a strong wind for him to even get a kickoff into the endzone, and it better have been a really strong wind.

As for the fumble rule: what do you suggest? the fumbling team get the ball right where the fumble occured? That doesn't really seem right either, given that if you fumble into your own endzone it would be a safety. I think you are right in saying that the endzones are different. But I do think the current rule is a good one.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
jon.jpgJon - many posts
09/18/2006 @ 06:21:55 PM
 Quote this comment
yeah you get the ball where you fumbled it. Why should the other team get the ball?
Maybe the fumbling team could just take it back to the 20.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
jeremy.jpgJeremy - 8953 Posts
09/18/2006 @ 07:20:42 PM
 Quote this comment
That rule is bizarre in that generally speaking, whether or not you like a rule, you can see the thought behind it.

The tuck rule is lame, but since you can't judge intent just assume they always meant to throw...or something.

I can't for the life of me think of what the rationale for this fumble rule is, given that you can no longer advance the football on a fumble. I suspect that it had something to do with adding a risk of running the "fumbalaya."
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
fry6beeu9.jpgJeremy - 8953 Posts
09/18/2006 @ 07:23:06 PM
 Quote this comment
Though if I had one thing to change it would be using college's overtime system.

If I had my way with football I would overhaul the sport technologically.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
jeremy.jpgJeremy - As Seen On The Internet
09/18/2006 @ 07:27:29 PM
 Quote this comment
By the way, is it ok to assume everyone would have picked the Rams?
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
2887.gifAlex - You've got to trust your instinct, and let go of regret
09/18/2006 @ 07:36:49 PM
 Quote this comment
Yes, everyone picked the Rams.

The fumble rule is dumb, I'd say ball on the 10 yard line and the play counts for a down.

I'd also use the college overtime and receivers should only need one foot down.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
question_mark.gifSarah (Guest)
09/18/2006 @ 07:55:18 PM
 Quote this comment
Beeeya!
Rate this comment
Yours:

Total:

Rated 1 times.
jon.jpgJon - many posts
09/18/2006 @ 10:28:24 PM
 Quote this comment
I don't like the college overtime thing. It just ends up being a surreal chain of events because there end up being 3 and 4 overtimes. By the way, wouldn't that just ruin fantasy in a lot of ways? Anyway, to me it just seems like it's too much of a brand new game. Like, ok we were playing football, now we're playing a game you play in your backyard. I would rather just tweak the nfl current system and either just play an entire quarter more and deal with a few more ties or do a "last ups" type of system where once someone scores you get a chance to match it but you have to drive the length of the field. There would be more ties this way too. By the way, Matt and I discussed this topic too.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Total:

Rated 1 times.
Jon edited this at 09/18/2006 10:29:21 pm
scott.jpgScott - If you aren't enough without it, you'll never be enough with it.
09/18/2006 @ 10:34:12 PM
 Quote this comment
NFL overtime is good. Kickoffs are part of football. You can't take that away. You could just play another 7:00 non-sudden death qtr or something like that. But the college rule is kinda lame. Just because it's exciting doesn't make it a good system.

should a fumble into your OWN end zone still be a safety? If your answer is "No", than I might agree with you about your gripe. If you think both situations should be where the fumble occured, than I agree. It really can't be one and not the other. And I can see the thought behind the rule. It makes perfect sense to me.

I think 2 feet is a good rule too. The game has already whored out for more offense as it is with the "can't breathe on a reciever after five yards" rule. Give defense a few rules now and then. Man, I am Mr. opposite today.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Total:

Rated 1 times.
scott.jpgScott - Get Up! Get outta here! Gone!
09/18/2006 @ 10:35:00 PM
 Quote this comment
I agree with Jon's most recent comment about overtime.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Total:

Rated 1 times.
scott.jpgScott - 6225 Posts
09/18/2006 @ 10:36:13 PM
 Quote this comment
Well, the "last ups" is kinda weird, but I agree with the idea of just tweaking the current system.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Total:

Rated 1 times.
jeremy.jpgJeremy - Pie Racist
09/18/2006 @ 10:45:15 PM
 Quote this comment
I don't care about the "excitement" of the college system. My gripe is the sudden deathness of the current overtime system.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Total:

Rated 1 times.
Jeremy screwed with this at 09/18/2006 11:16:09 pm
2887.gifAlex - 3618 Posts
09/18/2006 @ 10:47:44 PM
 Quote this comment
More offense is almost always better, and despite recent rule changes offenses aren't exactly running rampant this year.

They could not count college-style overtime as official stats or something like that. But even the current overtime system isn't really "fair" in the fantasy world. I think we had this discussion last year actually.

PS - We want Batch, we want Batch! Actually, I couldn't care less, but someone had to make the comment.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
Alex perfected this at 09/18/2006 10:49:54 pm
jon.jpgJon - Nutcan.com's kitten expert
09/18/2006 @ 10:49:07 PM
 Quote this comment
Scott said

"should a fumble into your OWN end zone still be a safety? If your answer is "No", than I might agree with you about your gripe. If you think both situations should be where the fumble occured, than I agree. It really can't be one and not the other"

I think you can be for one and not the other. Though I don't really care as much about the other rule. But, just thinking out loud, if fumbling out of your own end zone and out of bounds is somewhat like running out of bounds in your own end zone, there really isn't an analog to fumbling forward into the other end zone and out of bounds because they can't give you a touchdown for it. Anyway, depending on how you look at it, I'm probably supporting both arguments. But see it's weird somewhat to be able to fumble out of bounds anywhere in the regular field and not be penalized at all, but if you do it in either end zone, you're screwed. This post probably makes no sense.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
jeremy.jpgJeremy - 8953 Posts
09/19/2006 @ 08:37:07 AM
 Quote this comment
I don't see why they can't be treated differently. Running out of bounds with the ball is a safety in one and a touchdown in the other.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Total:

Rated 1 times.
scott.jpgScott - You're going to have to call your hardware guy. It's not a software issue.
09/19/2006 @ 09:53:23 AM
 Quote this comment
but you cannot run out of bounds in your opposing teams endzone. Once you are in the endzone you don't come out. It's a touchdown.

Say a team is at the 1 yard line and about to score, but they fumble the ball into the endzone. the defending team sees the opportunity to recover it and prevent the other team from scoring a touchdown. the offensive team realizes that they have little chance that they will recover the fumble, but don't want to lose posession, so they do everything they can and ultimately kick the ball out of the endzone, retaining posession at the 1 yard line where they score the next play. Sorry defense, the other team played bush-league and it looks like you lose.

Sure this can go both ways, but a defensive team is more likely to try and pounce because the penalty for not getting the ball out of bounds is 7 points. the offense only loses posession.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
jeremy.jpgJeremy - As Seen On The Internet
09/19/2006 @ 10:12:59 AM
 Quote this comment
While I never thought of that situation it still should be pointed out that the team that last had possession could just knock the ball out of bounds anywhere else on the field. Also there's no "penalty" for doing that anywhere else on the field.

Besides that the rule never comes into play in situations like that. I've only ever seen it happen where a player was reaching for the goal line and lost the ball at the .0000005 yard line where it then crossed inside of the pylon and out of bounds.

If they were reaching for a first down at the 1 and lost it at the 1.5 yard line and it went out of bounds the ball would be spotted at the 1.5 yard line.

Why does crossing the goal line change things into one of the worst penalties in football? 2 millimeters from scoring a touchdown and now it's the other teams' ball 20 yards up field?
Rate this comment
Yours:

Total:

Rated 1 times.
scott.jpgScott - 6225 Posts
09/19/2006 @ 11:07:24 AM
 Quote this comment
while i really don't disagree with you, I stick by the current situation. And the worst penalty in football is having Joe Buck be the play-by-play announcer for your game.

It seems that usually the situation is when an offensive player is heading for the endzone and a defender chasing him strips/punches the ball out and it goes out of bounds. In 1996, Robert Brooks did this against the Vikings after a Viking intercepted a pass and Brooks chased him down and punched the ball out of the endzone and the Packers ended up with the ball at the 20. The Vikings still won that game.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
hoochpage.JPGSarah - How do you use these things?
09/20/2006 @ 08:06:45 PM
 Quote this comment
I kind of only glanced through all of this, but I think they should play a whole nother quarter. No sudden death, whoever gets the ball first has a better chance of winning.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
hoochpage.JPGSarah - So's your face
09/20/2006 @ 09:35:03 PM
 Quote this comment
So Twins play on ESPN2 tomorrow. Someone call Charter and make sure we get it. Now if only the White Sox would win this game.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
Leave a Comment of your very own
Name:
Comment:
Verify this code
Verify the Code in this box, or sign in, to post a comment.
click me!
There's an emoticon for how you feel!
click me!
My Files
Sign up, or login, to be able to upload files for Nutcan.com users to see.