NFL 2004 Season Week 9 Picks
Create an Account or Login to make your own picks!These are not our most current picks!
Our freshest batch of picks are the NFL 2007 Season Super Bowl Picks.

Jets
Cardinals
Chiefs
Raiders
Cowboys
Lions
Chargers
Giants
Seahawks
Broncos
Patriots
Ravens
Vikings
| Week: | 7 - 7 0.500 |
| Season: | 71 - 59 0.546 |
| Lifetime: | 396 - 267 - 1 0.596 |
Create an Account or Login to make your own picks!
Vikings 28 @ Colts 31
Jeremy: I'm not sure if Moss is playing or not. However since a MN loss helps the pack look for the team jet to go down on the way to Indy. Somehow Daunte survives the wreakage but gets injured Thursday before the Packer game when the stage collapses at the press conference and the podium he was talking at falls over and slightly grazes his back.Matt: Culpepper takes my Fantasy team back to a sizable lead...... Minnesota 47 - Indy 23
Jon: I once claimed that if I was somehow allowed to be a Packer wide receiver I could finish the year with at least 50 receptions. Along that same line of thinking, I'm pretty sure I could throw for approximately 200 yards against the colts. Honestly though, without Moss, it doesn't look too great for Minnesota. But I won't pick against them.
Sarah: Let's see a shoot out! I hope the Vikings go down. We were able to match the Colts almost point for point. But, the Vikings blow so I don't think they can do it. Next week BRING IT!
|
| Jon - many posts 11/04/2004 @ 03:48:00 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
"I think page 3 writers should be fined or suspended for not getting their picks in by the wednesday deadline." --Sarah Brovan, Week 5 |
||
|
| Sarah - 1862 Posts 11/04/2004 @ 05:18:10 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| I concur. I honestly forgot that it was Wednesday and I had all the time in the world yesterday to do my picks too, which is the bad thing. Instead I watched the stupid movie "Team America." (Yes, illegally Jon) So, that about does it. | ||
|
| Sarah - 1862 Posts 11/04/2004 @ 05:18:32 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| Oh, and I have some weird picks, I agreed with Matt on some of mine! eek! | ||
|
| Scott - 2883 Posts 11/04/2004 @ 09:31:31 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| it's weird, Viking fans seem to think that everything that helps the Packers is some weird mandate from a higher being that only happens because it's the Packers, as if all teams are 100% healthy until they play the Packers. But if it works, hey, I can't complain. | ||
|
| Scott - Resident Tech Support 11/04/2004 @ 09:38:46 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Oh yeah, Washington, Miami, Pittsburgh, Jets, KC, Dallas, Carolina, Giants, New Orleans, Seattle, St. Louis, Denver, Baltimore, Indianapolis I agree with Jeremy, pittsgurgh will do it again. St. Louis gives New England their 2nd straight loss, and people will start asking "What's happening to New England?", and then New England goes on to win out the rest of the regular season. Indy will beat the Vikes in a close one, 49-42, just touchdowns, no field goals or defense. And Wisconsin beats Minnesota in a blowout. |
||
|
| Scott - Dog fighting is sick. Don't be a Vick. 11/04/2004 @ 09:40:46 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| pittsburgh, not pittsgurgh, what was I thinking | ||
|
| Matt - 1482 Posts 11/04/2004 @ 10:05:38 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| It's not all Viking fans Scott, mainly just Jeremy. | ||
|
| Jeremy - I believe virtually everything I read. 11/04/2004 @ 11:02:39 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| It doesn't happen only to the Packers, it just happens everytime for the packers. | ||
|
| Scott - Brett Favre Brett Favre Brett Favre Brett Favre Brett Favre Brett Favre Bre 11/05/2004 @ 10:04:27 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
| ah, i see | ||
|
| Scott - Brett Favre Brett Favre Brett Favre Brett Favre Brett Favre Brett Favre Bre 11/05/2004 @ 10:09:18 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
| if Moss starts this week, the will be no more rediculous talk about Favre having token starts, because Moss will become the poster boy for token starts. That said, Favre is on pace for his 4th 4000 yard season. | ||
|
| Jeremy - Always thinking of, but never about, the children. 11/05/2004 @ 01:24:12 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Moss was actually in the game quite a bit. He would have had a TD if got his feet in. Granted he was only in like 10 plays but we went 3 and out like everytime. His leg tightened up over halftime so he stayed out. His two have been close but to me a token start his they roll you out in a wheel chair to be in the first play. Maybe they should just change what constitutes a start, rather than having it based on who happens to be in the first formation. |
||
|
| icbeast - From now on, that's how you drive 11/05/2004 @ 05:14:05 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
DET, ARI, PHILLY, BUFF, KC, CIN, OAK, NYG, SD, SEA, NE, HOU, BALT, INDY So by your definition, no one has ever had a token start? |
||
|
| Sarah - 1862 Posts 11/06/2004 @ 09:34:57 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
| No one except brett favre. but i guess that opinion has changed since moss has had the token to top all token starts. | ||
|
| Jeremy - 5109 Posts 11/06/2004 @ 09:57:14 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
I just think the phrase token start gets tossed around too much. There are lots of players that try unsucsessfully to play through injuries. They said he was going to play as a redzone decoy and 2 weeks in a row he did and was 4 inches from having a TD. I don't think there was anything token about the second game and the first was borderline. I guess Favre doesn't have any, maybe if he didn't have a bye every freaking time right after he gets hurt he might. |
||
|
| Matt - Nutcan.com's MBL 11/06/2004 @ 10:43:11 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
| He did give up a token sack once. | ||
|
| Scott - Brett Favre Brett Favre Brett Favre Brett Favre Brett Favre Brett Favre Bre 11/06/2004 @ 10:46:38 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
| the bye week thing is a big conspiracy, because actually, the NFL waits until Favre gets hurt and THEN they schedule the bye week. It's werid. | ||
|
| Jeremy - 5109 Posts 11/06/2004 @ 11:10:17 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
| It's called luck. | ||
|
| Scott - 2883 Posts 11/06/2004 @ 02:24:03 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| in 1996, the Packers lost their number 1 receiver, Robert Brooks for the season in like week 6, and then lost Antonio Freeman for about a month in like week 9 or something like that, eventually their starting receivers were Terry Mickens(don't be shocked if you've never heard of him), Don Beebe, and Derrik Mayes (they did pick up Andre Rison halfway through the season too). Oh yeah, they lost their pro-bowl TE Mark Chmura for like a month too somewhere in that stretch. The Packers have had their seasons of crappy luck too, it just so happened that in this year, probably their worst year as far as injuries goes, they won the Super Bowl. | ||
|
| Sarah 11/06/2004 @ 02:33:05 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| I remember Terry Mickens. Derrick Mayes was suppose to be the next best thing, good thing he went with Mike Holmgren to Seattle, because he never amounted to anything. '96 was a good year. Chmura hurt his foot in Kansas City, but that might've been another year or something, I don't remember. But, the team pulled together, our defense was awesome and we got ourselves a Super Bowl. Just have to fight through the injuries and not complain about other team's "luck." | ||
|
| Jeremy - 5109 Posts 11/06/2004 @ 02:39:47 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| and Robert Brooks was almost as important to your team as Moss is, so that is a fair comparison, I'll be quiet now. | ||
|
| Sarah - 1862 Posts 11/07/2004 @ 03:29:21 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
| He was our #1 receiver, but we found other ways to score. | ||
|
| Jeremy - Super Chocolate Bear 11/07/2004 @ 10:36:47 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
| Donald Driver is your #1 now, and he's not even the best WR on the team. | ||
|
| Jeremy - 5109 Posts 11/07/2004 @ 01:46:19 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| I'm bored and don't really care about the one game on tv. So I'm going to try to do "live" scoring. | ||
|
| Sarah - 1862 Posts 11/07/2004 @ 08:58:33 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| Page 3 staffers are hurtin' with the picks.... I was so close with my miami pick, came down to the last 20 seconds! | ||
|
| Jeremy - 5109 Posts 11/07/2004 @ 10:20:13 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| This is the first week I've won since week 1. | ||
|
| Jeremy - 5109 Posts 11/07/2004 @ 10:50:01 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
One game left. I had this one in the L column going into the season so I'll just consider it a bonus if we come out ahead. Without Moss I don't know if this is going to be the 1000 point shootout the NFL/ABC is hyping it to be. |
||
|
| Scott - Ma'am, can you make sure your computer is turned on? 11/08/2004 @ 09:30:26 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| man, I thought picking the over would be a surewin. What's going on in this game. | ||
|
| Jeremy - Corduroy pillows are making headlines 11/08/2004 @ 11:10:21 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Just good enough to keep my hopes up, not enough to not break my heart. Packers are going down. |
||
|
| Jeremy - I believe virtually everything I read. 11/08/2004 @ 11:28:02 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| Jon narrowly in first despite leaving about 7 million points on the bench this week. | ||
|
| icbeast - You've got to trust your instinct, and let go of regret 11/08/2004 @ 11:33:33 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
9-5, 72-58 If my hasty calculations are at all correct, the top 5 in the fantasy league will be seperated by about 23 points, or the equivalent of one 60 yard pass to yourself for a TD plus the 2-point conversion pass to yourself. And then there's those 2 other teams. If Bellicheck wouldn't be such a stingy bastard with his injury reports, not playing a "Questionable" Dillon one week, and then playing a "Questionable" Givens the next, I'd be in first. That was cool when Rison was a Packer. |
||
|
| icbeast - The fastest way to a man's heart is with Chuck Norris's fist 11/08/2004 @ 11:34:55 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| I guess I was right, you should've told me you where doing that. :) Or I could've typed faster. | ||
|
| Sarah - 1862 Posts 11/08/2004 @ 11:45:27 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| Next week the Pack could be sitting atop the division, even if the Lions win. Who would've seen that 4 weeks ago? Sweet. | ||
|
| Jeremy - 5109 Posts 11/09/2004 @ 01:10:05 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
I saw it coming. You all were the drama queens declaring the season over in week 4. There's a lot of football still to go. Don't be surprised if the vikes drop the next 2 before Moss comes back. The second half of the season is pretty easy...if there is such a thing. Despite the loss I was pretty proud of my boys...don't expect a cake walk just because our best player is out. There is no concievable reason that if the packers are anywhere as good as yall think they are that they would let the vikes out with a win. |
||
|
| Scott - 2883 Posts 11/09/2004 @ 02:09:31 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| I never counted the Pack out. They'll win out, and continue this year's weird happenings in sports (red sox winning the world series, red sox coming back from 3-0, all 5 Florida football teams that played losing on the same weekend, the Redskins failing to predict the president), the pack will be only like the 3rd team maybe in history to make the playoffs after starting 1-4. Blowout this weekend. That's what I predict. | ||
|
| Jeremy - Always thinking of, but never about, the children. 11/09/2004 @ 05:29:39 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| To put it another way it doesn't mean much if the Packers win, because they have 1000 reasons why they should. It DOES mean alot if they lose. | ||
|
| Scott - You're going to have to call your hardware guy. It's not a software issue. 11/09/2004 @ 05:34:01 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| maybe, but the big emphasis made earlier in the season was about a team's chances about making the playoffs after starting the season 1-4, and since this year in sports has had many of these types of stats and senerios go against the odds, it would be fitting for the Packers to keep winning. | ||
|
| Jeremy - No one's gay for Moleman 11/09/2004 @ 06:12:38 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| Paraiety (sp?) is at an all time high in the NFL. Those stats are meaningless. There used to be a reason to lose, or win, 4 in a row. Now it's any given Sunday and sometimes the coin comes up heads 4 times. | ||
|
| icbeast - 2098 Posts 11/09/2004 @ 06:35:30 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Parity (please tell me you weren't serious with that spelling) is really not so prevalent as the media would have everyone believe. The Patriots have a mini dynasty going, the Steelers and Eagles are crushing teams left and right, while Miami, Carolina, and SF can't win. The playing field has only leveled slightly, if at all. What has changed is that a 4-12 team one year can be a 12-4 team next year. "Any given Sunday" is overused motivational, ratings-driving media propoganda. The Packers may have 1000 reasons why they should win the game, but you have 10,000 excuses about everything Vikings. And it does mean a lot if the Packers win, it means they'll be in first place sucka! |
||
|
| Jeremy - 5109 Posts 11/09/2004 @ 07:02:49 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
You listed 6 teams, there are 26 more. It doesn't mean a lot if the Packers win. They should win. Teams should win at home. Teams should win coming off of a bye. Teams should beat other teams when their best player is out. They would be in first, yes, by a tie breaker, in week 10. The Vikes will get Moss back start owning again and the Packers will lose to the Texans, Rams, Eagles, Jags, and Vikes. |
||
|
| Scott - Resident Tech Support 11/09/2004 @ 10:20:59 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| that's why they play the games.....that is the most important part. parity is only so good. | ||
































Browns 13 @ Ravens 27
Jeremy: I have nothing to say about this game so I'll pretend it's supposed to be about the Philly @ Roethlisberger game and make the probably not so bold prediction that Pit ends two undefeated seasons in a row and that those miserable bastard Dolphins will be popping corks this week.Matt: The Art Modell game. Baltimore wins 13 - 7, Cleveland accuses Baltimore's defense of intimidating them.
Jon: Michael Jackson once played for each of these teams.
Sarah: Ah one of the great showdowns of the week. Football sux when ur team doesn't play. Plus the Vikings don't even play until Monday, so i don't really have a game to watch that I am all that interested in.