NFL 2004 Season Week 4 Picks

Create an Account or Login to make your own picks!

These are not our most current picks!
Our freshest batch of picks are the NFL 2018 Season Super Bowl Picks.

Jeremy's PicksMatt's PicksJon's PicksSarah's Picks
Patriots 31 @ Bills 17
Sun, 10/3/04 12:00pm
5 Picks - 100% 0 Picks - 0%
Patriots
Patriots
Patriots
Patriots
Patriots
Patriots
Patriots
Patriots
Redskins 13 @ Browns 17
Sun, 10/3/04 12:00pm
2 Picks - 40% 3 Picks - 60%
Browns
Browns
Redskins
Redskins
Redskins
Redskins
Browns
Browns
Eagles 19 @ Bears 9
Sun, 10/3/04 12:00pm
5 Picks - 100% 0 Picks - 0%
Eagles
Eagles
Eagles
Eagles
Eagles
Eagles
Eagles
Eagles
Giants 14 @ Packers 7
Sun, 10/3/04 12:00pm
2 Picks - 40% 3 Picks - 60%
Packers
Packers
Giants
Giants
Packers
Packers
Packers
Packers
Raiders 17 @ Texans 30
Sun, 10/3/04 12:00pm
3 Picks - 60% 2 Picks - 40%
Raiders
Raiders
Texans
Texans
Raiders
Raiders
Texans
Texans
Colts 24 @ Jaguars 17
Sun, 10/3/04 12:00pm
4 Picks - 80% 1 Pick - 20%
Colts
Colts
Colts
Colts
Colts
Colts
Colts
Colts
Bengals 17 @ Steelers 28
Sun, 10/3/04 12:00pm
3 Picks - 60% 2 Picks - 40%
Bengals
Bengals
Bengals
Bengals
Steelers
Steelers
Bengals
Bengals
Falcons 27 @ Panthers 10
Sun, 10/3/04 3:05pm
2 Picks - 40% 3 Picks - 60%
Panthers
Panthers
Panthers
Panthers
Falcons
Falcons
Panthers
Panthers
Saints 10 @ Cardinals 34
Sun, 10/3/04 3:05pm
4 Picks - 80% 1 Pick - 20%
Cardinals
Cardinals
Saints
Saints
Saints
Saints
Saints
Saints
Broncos 16 @ Buccaneers 13
Sun, 10/3/04 3:15pm
5 Picks - 100% 0 Picks - 0%
Broncos
Broncos
Broncos
Broncos
Broncos
Broncos
Broncos
Broncos
Titans 17 @ Chargers 38
Sun, 10/3/04 3:15pm
3 Picks - 60% 2 Picks - 40%
Titans
Titans
Titans
Titans
Titans
Titans
Chargers
Chargers
Jets 17 @ Dolphins 9
Sun, 10/3/04 3:15pm
5 Picks - 100% 0 Picks - 0%
Jets
Jets
Jets
Jets
Jets
Jets
Jets
Jets
Rams 24 @ 49ers 14
Sun, 10/3/04 7:30pm
5 Picks - 100% 0 Picks - 0%
Rams
Rams
Rams
Rams
Rams
Rams
Rams
Rams
Chiefs 27 @ Ravens 24
Mon, 10/4/04 8:00pm
0 Picks - 0% 5 Picks - 100%
Ravens
Ravens
Ravens
Ravens
Ravens
Ravens
Ravens
Ravens
Week Record8 - 6
0.571
Worst Place
8 - 6
0.571
Worst Place
8 - 6
0.571
Worst Place
9 - 5
0.643
Season Record36 - 24
0.600
36 - 24
0.600
37 - 23
0.617
36 - 24
0.600
No-Pack-Vike Record2517 - 1476
0.630
2447 - 1546
0.613
2530 - 1463
0.634
2492 - 1501
0.624
Lifetime Record369 - 224
0.622
328 - 265
0.553
353 - 240
0.595
358 - 235
0.604
click me!
Other Nut Canner Picks
question_mark.gif
Patriots
Browns
Eagles
Giants
Raiders
Jaguars
Steelers
Falcons
Saints
Broncos
Chargers
Jets
Rams
Ravens

Week:10 - 4
0.714
Season:34 - 26
0.567
Lifetime:359 - 234
0.605
Create an Account or Login to make your own picks!

Giants 14 @ Packers 7

jeremy.jpg
Jeremy
Bye weeks suck...so do the Packers.
matt.jpg
Matt
Sarah, I think you mean LAMBERT Field. Giants win 27 - 12.
jon.jpg
Jon
This game is a tough one. I think the Giants can take this one, but I don't know if I'm letting wishful thinking get in the way of thinking through this. On the other hand, I kind of think the Packers' offense should be able to do well against the Giants. Although it might just be me trying to do reverse wishful thinking so I really don't know what's going to happen. Not that I really know what's going to happen all the other times. Home teams have to have some advantage, no?
sarah.jpg
Sarah
Kurt Warner returns to the FROZEN TUNDRA of LAMBEAU FIELD. Well, you can never go home. Besides, the Packers need a win. I mean, really, really need a win. We also need some secondary. I mean, really, really need some secondary. Remember that hit on Manning, Eli in the first week? Yea that was pretty sweet. I feel bad for Warner because he was like this QB that was on top of the world for like 3 years and then BAM! He sucked. Apparently he did ok last week, but I am pretty sure the Giants are having some emotional problems so I think they will crumble. I still think the Packer's offense played awesome. I wish they could do that every week. Why don't they? Cream Corn!

Rams 24 @ 49ers 14

jeremy.jpg
Jeremy
Knibb High Football Rules!
matt.jpg
Matt
I actually did pick San Francisco, before I picked against them. St. Louis 14 - San Francisco 11.
jon.jpg
Jon
St. Louis just has too good of an offnese for me to pick against them. I know that the rams aren't as good as they used to be, but San Francisco is in a hurting place right now.
sarah.jpg
Sarah
Um.... remember the 80's and 90's when the 49ers were good? I have already forgotten. That's how bad this team is. They are the suckiest team out there possibly. Maybe even worse than the Cardinals. The Chargers are actually possibly good this year. Not 8-8 good but maybe 5-11 good. Ah, i'm blabbing. St. Louis is not doing that great. Martz is getting in trouble by the press, apparently he was a genius and now he's the crazy uncle who should be kept in the attic. I still think St. Louis will win this one.

Chiefs 27 @ Ravens 24

jeremy.jpg
Jeremy
KC is not good, they weren't even good last year, can we all get over this already?
matt.jpg
Matt
I'm watching I, Max right now and Max had a line at the beginning that I found funny. I will repeat it for all who care. "Hey Montreal, we must be cousins cause my Uncle Sam is your daddy." Hilarious... K.C. goes to 0-4. Baltimore wins 4 - 2.
jon.jpg
Jon
Kansas City? Are you kidding me? Let me tell you why I won't pick them to win. Jamal Lewis. Baltimore defense. On top of that, even when Dominick Davis got injured last game, the Houston Texans still beat the Kansas Cities.
sarah.jpg
Sarah
Wow. Talk about doing a 180. The Chiefs started last year 9-0 or something. Now they're 0-3. That sux. FOR THEM! ha. Baltimore has a very good defense and they should be able to stop this offense that hasn't done diddly in the red zone. I feel bad for good players who play on bad teams. This may end up being the case for Priest Holmes. Maybe he'll retire early, I mean afterall, he was going to do it last year.
fry6beeu9.jpgJeremy - The pig says "My wife is a slut?"
09/30/2004 @ 07:07:08 PM
 Quote this comment
I see I'm the only one to pick the Arizona upset
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
hoochpage.JPGSarah - How do you use these things?
09/30/2004 @ 07:31:52 PM
 Quote this comment
I went once again with the San Diego upset. Maybe one of these days it'll happen. "it's raining men!"
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
fry6beeu9.jpgJeremy - Always thinking of, but never about, the children.
09/30/2004 @ 08:34:27 PM
 Quote this comment
I forgot about the debates and just turned them on about ten minutes ago. Has Kerry been owning Bush this bad the entire time?
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
hoochpage.JPGSarah - 4091 Posts
09/30/2004 @ 08:35:30 PM
 Quote this comment
This Bush guy is a moron.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
jeremy.jpgJeremy - 8953 Posts
09/30/2004 @ 08:43:16 PM
 Quote this comment
Lockbox
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
fry6beeu9.jpgJeremy - No one's gay for Moleman
09/30/2004 @ 08:48:32 PM
 Quote this comment
Bush needs to bring up the flip flopper issue a bit more.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
hoochpage.JPGSarah - How do you use these things?
09/30/2004 @ 08:50:20 PM
 Quote this comment
Oh MY GOOD LORD! Hey Matt- Guess who registered to vote and who's now going to vote democrat for everything because this jackass is a moron? yea that's right- me! This guy is not a good thinker. He's like a little kid. "You can't change your mind." "Well I have to change my mind because I was wrong." "Well you can't change your mind" Great Diversion blah blah blah
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
jeremy.jpgJeremy - 8953 Posts
09/30/2004 @ 08:54:40 PM
 Quote this comment
Bush has alot of nerve using the phrase "speaking clearly"
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
jeremy.jpgJeremy - Super Chocolate Bear
09/30/2004 @ 09:12:54 PM
 Quote this comment
mmm...mmm ma maa mi mmmmi mixed messages.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
scott.jpgScott - 6225 Posts
10/01/2004 @ 12:42:30 AM
 Quote this comment
word
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
2887.gificbeast - 3618 Posts
10/01/2004 @ 01:29:26 AM
 Quote this comment
Kerry sucks. If he would get elected and follow through on half the things he promised tonight, taxes would double, and he would be more worried about making popular "global" decisions than doing what's best for the US. Also, he first criticized the spending of $200 billion in Iraq, then later said that Bush wasn't supplying the troops with enough equipment. Does that make any sense to anyone? Anyway...

NE, PHI, INDY, CLE, OAK, GB, PITT, CAR, NO, DEN, NYJ, SD, STL, BALT

What a weekend for baseball!!
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
matt.jpgMatt - Nutcan.com's MBL
10/01/2004 @ 07:41:45 AM
 Quote this comment
Bush isn't a great speaker, I think we all knew that. Fortunatly, I don't vote by how well a person speaks. Bush was right to go into Iraq. Saddam disregarded 16 UN resoultions, and was a threat. When given a 17th and final chance to comply, he failed to do so. Bush, Blair, and others decided enough was enough. If you threaten serious consequences and don't follow through, what kind of message does that send the bad guys? There is nothing wrong with diplomacy, but unless its backed up with some force, it is useless. If Kerry was President, Saddam would still be in power, benefittng from the corrupt UN-oil for food program. Fortunatly Bush is President and Saddam is gone, and the world knows that the U.S. will not take anymore crap from evil dictators. Because of this Libya has begun to disarm, and other regimes will think twice before trying to pull the wool over the eyes of the rest of the world.

I know I kind of rambled there, hopefully it makes some sense. Although, what do I know...I'm not a very articulate speaker myself, so apparently, I'm a moron.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
jeremy.jpgJeremy - 8953 Posts
10/01/2004 @ 08:02:26 AM
 Quote this comment
You also aren't trying to convice 50 million viewers to choose you for the most important position in the world.

You are correct that diplomacy needs the threat of force behind it, which is why kerry voted to give Bush that leverage, but we didn't do everything possible and Saddam was not a clear enough threat to us to shoulder 90% of the work load and send people like Carl into harms way.

Kerry is upset that the war cost 200 billion, but now that it's on he thinks the troops should have seen a bigger share of that.

I didn't hear Kerry say anything that would effect taxes with the exception of shutting down our nuclear bunker buster program...which would lower them if anything.

ps Who said what's best for the world and what's best for the US are two different things?

pps Matt, you forgot about Poland.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
jeremy.jpgJeremy - The pig says "My wife is a slut?"
10/01/2004 @ 08:03:47 AM
 Quote this comment
Strategery
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
fry6beeu9.jpgJeremy - 8953 Posts
10/01/2004 @ 08:07:28 AM
 Quote this comment
ppps By the standards that made Sadaam a threat we've got a lot of wars in our future.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
jeremy.jpgJeremy - 1.21 Gigawatts!?!?
10/01/2004 @ 10:02:39 AM
 Quote this comment
When are you leaving Alex?

I guess better yet when do you expect to be there?
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
matt.jpgMatt - 3355 Posts
10/01/2004 @ 10:07:18 AM
 Quote this comment
What is everything possible? 12 years, 17 U.N. Resolutions and economic sanctions seems like a lot to me. More talking wouldn't have worked, especially when Saddam was making money off of France, Russia, and the oil for food program. He had been doing well for himself for years inspite of the UN's "threats". He knew the UN had no backbone and he banked on that staying the same. He wasn't going to one day wake up and say "Oh. You strenuously object. Then I'll take some time and reconsider."

P.S. Jeremy, I dont know where you got that whole best for the US/best for the world thing, because I didnt say it. The truth is that the interest of the U.S. and the World are often the same, unfortunatly when it comes to things like terrorism, the U.S. has the biggest target on its back and we must be able to defend ourselves against it.

P.P.S. Don't knock Poland, they've lived under the Nazis and under Communism. They know what it's like to be opressed and are giving what the can to free the Iraqi people.

P.P.P.S. If more wars are needed to get rid of terrorist threats, then more are needed. But by winning in Iraq and showing the leaders of these nations that they cant win if they decide to harbor and sponsor terror, then many of these potential conflicts can be avoided.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
fry6beeu9.jpgJeremy - As Seen On The Internet
10/01/2004 @ 10:10:46 AM
 Quote this comment
I was responding to you and Alex. I think Bush made it pretty clear he doesn't care about the UN. You can't say Bush was right to ignore the UN and go to war then justify the War by saying Saddam was ignoring the UN.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
fry6beeu9.jpgJeremy - Pie Racist
10/01/2004 @ 10:13:34 AM
 Quote this comment
And.....I wasnt knocking Poland, just making reference to the debate.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
2887.gificbeast - Refactor Mercilessly
10/01/2004 @ 10:17:12 AM
 Quote this comment
Ok, so it wasn't likely that Sadaam was going to invade the US anytime soon. Still he was a bad man who refused to listening to the rest of the world. We have taken 90% of the work load because we have 90% of the force and power of all the democratic countries. And it's true that if we strictly follow the same standards that led to war with Saddam there's probably a number of other countries and dictators that would qualify, but Sadaam was clearly the most well-known, most stuborn and unwilling to cooperate, and longest running threat. Hopefully making an example of Sadaam and Iraq will have an effect on other countries (such as Libya), and now the world realizes that we mean business (at least after the 17th UN resolution is ignored).

Also, one of Kerry's big points seemed to be that we needed to better our diplomatic relations with other countries and he criticized Bush for not doing so well enough before we went to war in Iraq. But then he later said that he wants to bypass the 6 party talks with North Korea and open up bilateral communications with whatever that guys name is. Seems contradictory to me, and agree with Bush that keeping China involved in those talks is extremely important.

Kerry is always talking way more health care, drugs for the elderly, last night he said he would create new troop divisions that wouldn't go to Iraq, he would get better and more equipment to the troops in Iraq, he would increase funding for the training of Iraqius (sp?), he wants to personally tour the globe and collect every piece of nuclear material every made (how come biological and chemical weapons were never mentioned last nigh?), those things cost money.

Seeings as the US seems to be the most hated country in the world, we need to hunt down terrorists and be more concered about certain other dictators and countries more than the rest of the world. Why should France and Germany care about terrorists and nuclear weapons? If they're satisfied to sit around and throw sanctions and resolutions at countries and then not doing anyting about it when the don't listen, then fine. But the US doesn't have that luxury, therefore what's best the US is not necessarily what's best for the rest of the world.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
2887.gificbeast - 3618 Posts
10/01/2004 @ 10:19:30 AM
 Quote this comment
The UN is not useful when it comes time to fight a war. They came provide humanitarian support and pass sanctions, but that's about it.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
newalex.jpgicbeast - But let history remember, that as free men, we chose to make it so!
10/01/2004 @ 10:20:15 AM
 Quote this comment
I think I'm meeting u guys at the church at 7.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
jeremy.jpgJeremy - 8953 Posts
10/01/2004 @ 10:21:29 AM
 Quote this comment
Which is where getting rid of the tax cut for the rich comes it.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
2887.gificbeast - I was too weak to give in Too strong to lose
10/01/2004 @ 10:26:33 AM
 Quote this comment
I doubt whether that will cover it.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
matt.jpgMatt - Ombudsman
10/01/2004 @ 10:26:58 AM
 Quote this comment
The reason some of us don't care for the U.N. right now is that they allowed themselves to be ignored by Saddam for 12 years.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
thumbnailCAW1I0O3.gifMatt - Ombudsman
10/01/2004 @ 10:31:16 AM
 Quote this comment
So everybody should get a tax cut except the rich?
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
fry6beeu9.jpgJeremy - Super Chocolate Bear
10/01/2004 @ 10:45:48 AM
 Quote this comment
First of all I meant get rid of cuts they already get, secondly to an extent, yes.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
newalex.jpgicbeast - I was too weak to give in Too strong to lose
10/01/2004 @ 10:45:56 AM
 Quote this comment
This is a less serious comment, just something my brain stumbled on. When they were talking about the war in Iraq it was brought up that the borders were not being policed effectively and more terrorist groups and such were coming into Iraq which is why fighting has stayed at the level it has and possibly increased. Now I believe Kerry first stated that as a problem, but I don't think they really talked about it too much.

It seems to me though that if we are fighting a global war on terrorism that it's not such a bad thing if the terrorists are coming out of hiding and confronting us. I suppose it doesn't help the situation in Iraq, but it seems better than having to try and keep intelligence on these groups as they are scattered around and in hiding. I think maybe that's why Bush kind of let that slide by and never really responded it to it. That's more of a conspiracy theory though than it is part of why I'm voting for Bush.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
jeremy.jpgJeremy - 1.21 Gigawatts!?!?
10/01/2004 @ 11:15:06 AM
 Quote this comment
Bush did kind of hint at that, but the same thing would have happened if we took out Osama, you know, the guy that actually attacked us.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
2887.gificbeast - Refactor Mercilessly
10/01/2004 @ 11:21:43 AM
 Quote this comment
true
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
2887.gificbeast - 3618 Posts
10/01/2004 @ 11:40:08 AM
 Quote this comment
But here's another conspiracy theory. We've supposedly captured 75% of Osama's leading men. Osama himself seems to be more of the "charasmatic" (notice the quotes) leader than the real brains or brawn behind anything. So two scenarios:

1) We capture him, one of his understudies steps up and rallies around "Remember the Osamao" and a circle begins.

2) We capture his top guys, his power and skills are weakened, he becomes desperate and makes a mistake, and we crush his ring of terror.

Sometimes cutting off the head of the beast kills it, and sometimes two new heads grow back.

I need more ties, because apparently a white dress shirt, dark gray tie, khaki pants, and doc marten's don't go together. (I almost forgot the word shirt, lol)
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
reign_of_fire.jpgMicah - I'm flippin' burgers / you at Kinko's straight flippin' copies
10/01/2004 @ 04:53:10 PM
 Quote this comment
First of all, Osama Bin Laden is not just a figurehead. He is incredibly rich and doesn't spend any of his money on Escalades and spinner rims.

Also, you are right that Kerry's programs are going to cost money. That is why you should never elect a democrat. because they will just spend and spend and then we will end up with trillions of dollars in deficits and the country will go to shit economically.....oh wait.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
scott.jpgScott - Resident Tech Support
10/01/2004 @ 05:02:11 PM
 Quote this comment
"The enemy attacked us" said Bush. I thought Osama was the enemy. Did Sadaam attack us? The 9/11 Commission says he didn't. Deceptive? I think so.


Pitt, Indy, New England, GB, Houston, Philly, Wash, Carolina, New Orleans, Denver, NY Jets, Tenn, Baltimore

I'm 29-17
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
matt.jpgMatt - 3355 Posts
10/01/2004 @ 07:04:44 PM
 Quote this comment
Al-Qaida attacked us on 9/11, but the war on Terror isn't limited to just those who planned and executed the attack on us. While the 9/11 commission did not find any Saddam -al-qaida connection in regards to the 9/11 attacks, Saddam and his regime had ties to terrorist groups, including al-qaida. Combine these ties with the pre-war intelligence telling Bush that Saddam had WMD's and the threat of Saddam passing weapons to al-qaida had to be taken seriously.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
scott.jpgScott - 6225 Posts
10/02/2004 @ 09:31:10 PM
 Quote this comment
...and freeze
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
jeremy.jpgJeremy - No one's gay for Moleman
10/03/2004 @ 12:28:18 AM
 Quote this comment
Perhaps all that is true, but we should have focused on Osama
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
scott.jpgScott - On your mark...get set...Terrible!
10/03/2004 @ 01:01:56 AM
 Quote this comment
and Moss got fined, was it legit?
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
matt.jpgMatt - 3355 Posts
10/03/2004 @ 08:06:04 AM
 Quote this comment
While the media may have "lost focus" on Afghanistan and Osama because of the Iraq war, that doesn't mean Bush did. Kerry may say that Iraq hurt the war in Afghanistan, but I believe Gen. Franks has said differently. As far as I've heard, the military commanders for Afghanistan have recieved all the troops that they said they needed.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
scott.jpgScott - No, I did not change your screen saver settings
10/03/2004 @ 12:54:01 PM
 Quote this comment
so the packers are playing right now
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
scott.jpgScott - Ma'am, can you make sure your computer is turned on?
10/03/2004 @ 01:19:59 PM
 Quote this comment
this is the worst game EVER
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
scott.jpgScott - Get Up! Get outta here! Gone!
10/03/2004 @ 01:23:44 PM
 Quote this comment
anyone just watch the play of the Bills punter? he fumbled the snap and then ran about 30 yards for a 1st down. Unbelievable
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
scott.jpgScott - Get Up! Get outta here! Gone!
10/03/2004 @ 01:43:59 PM
 Quote this comment
ok, Favre, unbelievable. That is one for the ages
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
scott.jpgScott - 6225 Posts
10/03/2004 @ 02:47:54 PM
 Quote this comment
i was referring to the TD he threw after being knocked out of the game, but I think he went out without the coaches and doctors realizing it. I hope he's ok.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
2887.gificbeast - 3618 Posts
10/03/2004 @ 02:53:10 PM
 Quote this comment
Where's Couch??
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
scott.jpgScott - 6225 Posts
10/03/2004 @ 03:14:23 PM
 Quote this comment
on the davenport, haha, funny
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
fry6beeu9.jpgJeremy - 8953 Posts
10/03/2004 @ 07:12:15 PM
 Quote this comment
Here's a question, what the hell were the coaches thinking going for it in that situation? Even though Favre ran out and did what he wanted coaches be damned and threw the TD they were already going for it with Pederson. The end result doesn't justify the awful decision.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
scott.jpgScott - Resident Tech Support
10/03/2004 @ 07:20:19 PM
 Quote this comment
what was the point of that comment? I dislike Mike Sherman as a coach.

wow, arizona won, didn't see that coming
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
scott.jpgScott - On your mark...get set...Terrible!
10/03/2004 @ 07:26:09 PM
 Quote this comment
the wind was nasty, and the giants kicker missed 3 fg's that normally would be gimmies, so maybe that's why they went for it. I think it was a pretty ok (quite agressive)decision, in a scoreless game. Who cares, they scored on that play, but lost the game, should have brought Nall in earlier, hope Favre will be back next week.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
jeremy.jpgJeremy - 8953 Posts
10/03/2004 @ 08:08:38 PM
 Quote this comment
There was only 1 miss at the time and the pack needed points. Even if you ARE going for it you go for the 5 yards, not the endzone. Add to that the fact that they had decided to go for it when they were struggling to get yards and without Favre and it was just dumb as hell.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
scott.jpgScott - 6225 Posts
10/03/2004 @ 08:56:08 PM
 Quote this comment
the going for the endzone part probably wasn't part of the game plan. Favre went out there most likely against the will of the coaches (without realizing he was even out there) and may have called that play himself. He says he doesn't even remember that he did it. That was the definition of a freak occurance.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
jeremy.jpgJeremy - The pig says "My wife is a slut?"
10/03/2004 @ 09:32:22 PM
 Quote this comment
That could be the case. Nall needs to be the backup.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
2887.gificbeast - 3618 Posts
10/03/2004 @ 10:18:19 PM
 Quote this comment
Judging from the way Farve celebrated, I think he thought he just won the Super Bowl.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
fry6beeu9.jpgJeremy - 8953 Posts
10/03/2004 @ 11:00:43 PM
 Quote this comment
Switchfoot is on ESPN's Ultimate Highlight
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
sarah.jpgSarah - How do you use these things?
10/04/2004 @ 03:50:13 PM
 Quote this comment
So we got rid of McKenzie. Good. He was trouble anyway. We picked up another QB. Here's my theory that I have now told Jeremy, Jon, and Matt. Favre is hurt. Pederson is hurt. Nall starts next week against the Titans on national television. He has a spectacular game, completely annihilating the Titans. Favre never plays again. The End. How sad would that be? His career would come full circle? It just can't end that way. Ok, so about McKenzie, we got a QB and a draft pick. Now we can right the ship and not have chaos. Oh, Micheal Bennett reinjured his knee and is out for 2 more weeks. That's about it, I need to keep working on my resume.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
2887.gificbeast - I don't need to get steady I know just how I feel
10/04/2004 @ 06:00:44 PM
 Quote this comment
Farve will play, I've never heard of J.T. O'Sullivan but even just to get a 2nd round pick alone out the situation would have been pretty good. Of course, I now have to root against the Saints every game, but they deserve it for losing to Arizona anyway. The Packers have a good history of getting QBs who end up having decent careers elsewhere (although not so much this managment), so maybe JT has got game. O'Sullivan is an unacceptable name however and I'm going to call him JTO from now on.

Seeings as how he can't stay healthy, I guess it's good for Bennett that he left college after starting only 1 year and got paid. Not so good for the Vikings and the one FF team I have him on.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
2887.gificbeast - Ignorance is bliss to those uneducated
10/04/2004 @ 06:14:49 PM
 Quote this comment
Bonds factoid of the day:

Draw so many walks that even if he'd gotten no hits all season, he still would have had a higher on-base percentage (.391), counting just his walks and hit-by-pitches, than the guy who led the National League, Juan Pierre (.374).

My team has sucked this week, so I'll be looking for 150 yards and 3 TDs from Jamal Lewis tonight.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
fry6beeu9.jpgJeremy - 8953 Posts
10/04/2004 @ 08:11:52 PM
 Quote this comment
Bennett has better numbers than Robert Smith did at the same point, so he's not as big of a bust so far that people make him out to be. Plus it's not like he got injured "again" it's all the same injury, they rushed him a bit and it backfired, he should have sat out 2 more weeks anyway.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
scott.jpgScott - 6225 Posts
10/04/2004 @ 09:38:31 PM
 Quote this comment
he should have stayed at wisconsin another year
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
fry6beeu9.jpgJeremy - 8953 Posts
10/04/2004 @ 10:15:03 PM
 Quote this comment
He should have double bagggkgrkloijijiijioijijgged it.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
2887.gificbeast - 3618 Posts
10/05/2004 @ 12:03:28 AM
 Quote this comment
I didn't say he was a bust, I just meant that the Vikings would be better off right now if he was healthy. I don't player hate on Badgers alumni.

I have no idea what that last comment is about.

KC's offensive line dominated tonight, 4 sure.

Playoffs start tomorrow, who can the Yankees lose to this year I wonder?

9-5 this week, 31-29 total. Breaking .500 for the first time. I'd consider trading a RB for a WR if anyone is interested.

Big games Saturday, Minn vs Mich and Wis vs OSU. Sweet they're back to back, I guess I know what I'm doing all day.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
fry6beeu9.jpgJeremy - No one's gay for Moleman
10/05/2004 @ 06:51:06 AM
 Quote this comment
That was my impression of Favre's brain slipping out of gear mid sentance.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
scott.jpgScott - 6225 Posts
10/05/2004 @ 04:55:21 PM
 Quote this comment
i went 8-6, and Favre is back next week on monday night, something
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
scott.jpgScott - 6225 Posts
10/07/2004 @ 12:00:02 PM
 Quote this comment
update! i have no life
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
scott.jpgScott - You're going to have to call your hardware guy. It's not a software issue.
10/07/2004 @ 04:51:10 PM
 Quote this comment
seriously
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
scott.jpgScott - Ma'am, can you make sure your computer is turned on?
10/08/2004 @ 10:43:59 AM
 Quote this comment
ummmm....guys?......yeah, it's ummmm...Friday....just in case you forgot.....the NFL didn't decide to skip this week or anything. So if you could go right ahead and take care of that right away, that would be great
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
Leave a Comment of your very own
Name:
Comment:
Verify this code
Verify the Code in this box, or sign in, to post a comment.
click me!
There's an emoticon for how you feel!
click me!
My Files
Sign up, or login, to be able to upload files for Nutcan.com users to see.