Link Stats
Added By: PackOne
Added on: 03/29/2008 @ 12:14:54 PM
Link View Count: 771
Sports
Sports
Rate this Link
Yours:

Rated 0 times.

Lambeau ... Not an Advantage.

Article on home-field advantage in critical games.
View External Link [www.packerforum.com]
Back to Link List
fry6beeu9.jpgJeremy - 9475 Posts
03/30/2008 @ 01:47:48 AM
 Quote this comment
Maybe they just suck.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Total:

Rated 2 times.
flower .jpgPackOne - 1528 Posts
03/30/2008 @ 08:32:25 AM
 Quote this comment
Thanks for your input.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Total:

Rated 1 times.
newalex.jpgAlex - 3619 Posts
03/31/2008 @ 02:56:15 AM
 Quote this comment
Does this study not take into account the strength of the opponent? Cause a lot of times you're playing a better team during the playoffs than in the regular season, so that alone could explain why you'd lose more.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
face.bmpCarlos44ec - ...and Bob's your Uncle!
03/31/2008 @ 07:39:34 AM
 Quote this comment
Playoffs?
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
avatar2345.jpgPackOne - She's got the whole wide world singing baby's song.
03/31/2008 @ 09:12:14 AM
 Quote this comment
Since it deals with home field, I would assume that the home team should have the better record/team in general for the most part. It does address some seeding effects in hockey/basketball type formats.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
jeremy.jpgJeremy - Cube Phenomenoligist
03/31/2008 @ 09:18:03 AM
 Quote this comment
Well, the NFL in particular has the division winners who might be just good enough to come out on top of a crappy division (I'm looking at you, Green Bay circa the last few years, not counting last year) and thus get to host a Wildcard Team who might be really good, and just got stuck behind a powerhouse division winner. I'm not sure how other sports do their seeding but I wouldn't be surprised if they had a system where the best team wasn't necessarily at home either.

Though the same could be said about the Giants I'd have to imagine even the most die hard Packer Fan would admit the Packers overachieved last year. Their fortunes were bound to run out sooner or later.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
Jeremy messed with this 2 times, last at 03/31/2008 9:25:50 am
avatar2345.jpgPackOne - 1528 Posts
03/31/2008 @ 09:58:44 AM
 Quote this comment
I think the bigger argument for the NFL comes down to how to build a team. Do you shoot for consistency through the draft, or rely on free agents with experience. I think this study makes a case that young/draft built teams are great regular season contenders, while veteran teams might just have less arousal in big time games, at home, although not consistent from year to year.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
face.bmpCarlos44ec - 2079 Posts
03/31/2008 @ 10:35:29 AM
 Quote this comment
Jeremy Wrote - 03/31/2008 @ 09:18:03 AM
I'd have to imagine even the most die hard Packer Fan would admit the Packers overachieved last year. Their fortunes were bound to run out sooner or later.


I will not! I take that comment as I would a glove in my face. Prepare yourself, Sir, for a duel!

PackOne will be my second. I suggest you find one as well.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
flower .jpgPackOne - 1528 Posts
03/31/2008 @ 11:30:33 AM
 Quote this comment
It was an issue of cohesion, not overachievement.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
jeremy.jpgJeremy - 9475 Posts
03/31/2008 @ 12:53:16 PM
 Quote this comment
Opening week: Vikes @ Lambeau Monday Night Football. Let's hope there's no advantage after all.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
newalex.jpgAlex - You've got to trust your instinct, and let go of regret
03/31/2008 @ 12:58:12 PM
 Quote this comment
PackOne Wrote - 03/31/2008 @ 09:12:14 AM
Since it deals with home field, I would assume that the home team should have the better record/team in general for the most part. It does address some seeding effects in hockey/basketball type formats.


Well yes, but that wasn't my point. New England gets to play Miami, New York J, and Buffalo at home during the regular season which is going to boost their regular season at home winning percentage compared to their at home playoff winning percentage when they are playing teams like Pitt, Jax, and Indy.

The fact that homefield winning percentage declines in the playoffs I think could probably be explained away entirely by comparing the regular season SOS to the playoff SOS. edit: doesn't really matter if the home team in question is "better" than the particular opponent
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
Alex perfected this at 03/31/2008 12:59:10 pm
flower .jpgPackOne - 1528 Posts
03/31/2008 @ 02:01:29 PM
 Quote this comment
I think the point it is trying to make is on arousal. Home field playoff advantage, to those trying to re-define themselves as champions, ie:young, inexperienced, non-repeat winners - perform much poorer at home in the playoffs as compared to the road. So yes, Alex I think you nailed it ... the field evens.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
Leave a Comment of your very own
Name:
Comment:
Verify this code
Verify the Code in this box, or sign in, to post a comment.
click me!
There's an emoticon for how you feel!
click me!
My Files
Sign up, or login, to be able to upload files for Nutcan.com users to see.