Link Stats
Added By: Jeremy
Added on: 08/18/2008 @ 12:17:41 PM
Link View Count: 1313
Science
Sprinkler Rainbow Conspiracy
I'm willing to concede that perhaps there is something contaminating her water supply. Do we have a "constitutional right" to water anyway?
View External Link [www.youtube.com]
Back to Link List
|
| Jeremy - As Seen On The Internet 08/18/2008 @ 12:27:47 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| Not to mention, what could this have to do with the Government's "thrist [sic] for energy?" | ||
|
| PackOne - "That's what I call gettin a piece of Pi" 08/18/2008 @ 02:42:08 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| Is that Roseanne? | ||
|
| Jeremy - Super Chocolate Bear 08/18/2008 @ 02:46:08 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| Ha, they do sound similar. I wonder what this woman thinks rainbows are in the sky when it's raining, and why she doesn't make the connection. Or, for that matter, why they are called rainbows. | ||
| Jeremy perfected this at 08/18/2008 2:46:14 pm | ||
|
| Carlos44ec - Tag This 08/18/2008 @ 03:48:30 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| "What is oozing out of..." her head. Oh, that's just them smarts. | ||
|
| Scott - If you aren't enough without it, you'll never be enough with it. 08/19/2008 @ 09:23:38 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
She says of a rainbow: "this cannot be natural!" Also, what "constitutional rights" is she even referring to? |
||
|
| craig - No, it's time to move on. 08/19/2008 @ 10:12:11 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Scott Wrote - Today @ 09:23:38 PM She says of a rainbow: "this cannot be natural!" Also, what "constitutional rights" is she even referring to? I believe she is referring to the Ninth Amendment, which states "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people." Which I, in my role of amateur lawyer and general know-it-all, take to mean that all rights not specifically mentioned as belonging to the government, are retained by the people. Which, unless I missed the part of the constitution where they government claimed the right to 'manipulate near ground level rainbows as required for the defense of the nation', and to be fair I didn't really look that hard, would mean that the right to 'rainbow free sprinklers' would still rest with we the people. I assume similar logic would apply to 'non-oozing ground', and the right to 'things that are natural'. The legal interpretation of this amendment is a bit hazy though. However, I fully expect that is particular case will go all the way to the supreme court (Crazy Lady vs. Rainbows, Sprinklers, Ooze, et al). |
||
| craig screwed with this at 08/19/2008 10:28:58 pm | ||
|
| Carlos44ec - ...and Bob's your Uncle! 08/20/2008 @ 07:56:40 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Maybe the military is testing it's new anti- anti-missile laser shield? http://www.space.com/news/laser_weapon_000607_wg.html |
||
|
| Alex - But let history remember, that as free men, we chose to make it so! 08/20/2008 @ 09:05:13 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| "What the hell is going on?" indeed. I love the sirens in the background. | ||
Leave a Comment of your very own
| Name: | |||
| Comment: | |||
| |||


Sign up, or login, to be able to upload files for Nutcan.com users to see.






Fetching Nutcan Content....






Total:
Rated 1 times.